As long as we are all reading books that tell us nothing of importance, then we’ll never know that the same tricks are being played on us over and over again.
Following are excerpts from a rare book in a private collection, along with other historical references to the manufacture of revolutions as part of a tricky take-over strategy. Written by Mrs. Nesta Webster, in 1921, “World Revolutions: The Plot Against Civilization”, Owens Publishing, Texas, compiled documents found in police archives around Europe; She references verifiable sources from the past 200-300 years, a time when people spoke openly of the Jewish people as a political force. The reason it is rare is because so many copies have been destroyed due to the fact that this subject was censored for as long as that was possible.
By: Suzanne Broussard
Weishaupt, credited for the founding of the Illuminati, wrote that:
“Every effort is made to persuade the public that no conspiracy exists, for once its existence is generally recognized its defeat is certain. Its whole success depends on secrecy.”
“On 11th of October 1786 Bavarian authorities descended upon the house of Zwack [an associate of Adam Weishaupt] and seized the documents which laid bare the methods of the conspirators. Here were found descriptions of a strong box for safeguarding papers which if forced open should blow up by means of an infernal machine. Of a composition which would blind or kill if squirted in the face. Of a method for counterfeiting seals, recipes for a particularly deadly kind of “aqua toffina” for poisonous perfumes that would fill a bedroom with pestilential vapours, and for a tea to procure abortion [miscarriage].”
What gave the authorities the information necessary to make this bust was a stroke of lightening which had struck one of their messengers with a pouch full of papers which revealed sufficient information to enable the house search.
Among the papers found were Instructions in the art of infiltration, of gaining control over a politically powerful individual (or group) by slow poisoning either of the body or the mind.
Evidence of this type of activity is abundant in history. Weishaupt and his people have clearly been successful in creating, through trickery, a kleptocracy that requires the enslavement of all but a small handful of people.
Some even question whether these beings are really people. Skeletal structure is known by scientists to be sufficiently different in some humans as to warrant being called a different species of human. However, voluntarily changing one’s behavior and beliefs is always an option and much easier if the entire environment encourages that change. It was this ‘entire learning environment’ that the Catholic Church had achieved with Feudalism, and which the Illuminati sought to turn upside down into something diametrically opposed Christianity.
What this means is that the propaganda techniques now being used to turn nice, happy people into miserable, delusional slaves can still be utilized as they were meant to be. Propaganda techniques were invented by the Jesuits to spread what was a truly good religion that all people were invited to believe in and practice and live by. As part of the bargain, the Catholic Church itself took on the role of protector, and played this role well for many centuries, as evidence by the records of economic and population growth during the 1500 years of the Christian Roman Empire. This 1500 years is generally skipped over as a result of the fact that the Catholic Church was an integral part of the success of Feudalism. Under feudalism, there is no place for usury. It is a free and willing exchange of services for protection and supplies. This is not the kind of thing that usurious interests want us to know about. Therefore, feudalism was attacked.
“The Elector of Bavaria, informed of the danger to the State, published an edict forbidding secret societies. In 1784, four men were summoned to court to testify: Utshchneider, Cossandeym, Grunberger, and Renner were all professors of the Marianen Academy.
What the authorities discovered during the investigation sounds so familiar to us today. “All religion, all love of country and loyalty to sovereigns are to be annihilated…Moreover, effort was made to create discord not only between princes and their subjects but between ministers and their secretaries, and even between parents and children, whilst suicide was to be encouraged…Espionage extended even to the post offices by placing adepts who possessed the art of opening letters and closing them again without fear of detection.”
Webster’s research of Bavarian police files reveals that on the 1st of May 1776 Weishaupt, after five years of preparation, founded the secret society that he named, after bygone philosophical systems, the Illuminati. This was a German sect professing Satanism, with which Weishaupt’s Order is probably connected, which had existed in the 15th century. Weishaupt chose to base his propaganda system upon that of the Jesuits in order to demolish religion by the same means that had been created to establish religion on a worldwide basis. “
The Jesuits had been kind enough to take on Jewish students as part of their mission to spread Christianity through example and through teaching. St. Ignacius words on the original founding document state that their purpose was:
“to strive especially for the defense and propagation of the faith and for the progress of souls in Christian life and doctrine.”
The Protocols are the subversion of this Christian mission. The Jesuits had devised a plan to spread Christianity by offering free education, both primary and advanced, world-wide to any who seek it. Thousands of people volunteered to teach, worldwide. And yet these people are openly slandered daily in the media and in public education.
How many times have we allowed ourselves to believe slander about a person or group, and applauded their demise, without bothering to investigate the allegations? It’s an old trick that makes use of our self-righteous delusions, and after falling for it, we shouldn’t be surprised that we end up with such corrupt leadership. How old are the tricks being used today? We can go back thousands of years and find examples of how a planned ‘revolution’ is used to usurp power by corrupt factions. Josephus described this third rail in action during the time of Jesus.
Most of the documents quoted by Webster are Jews writing about Jews in private correspondence, so they say things against their own people that non-jews wouldn’t know to say. Certainly there is a distinction between those who are part of the problem and those who aren’t, so I’ll start with this excerpt for my good Jewish friends because this article will appear rude, but it’s really important historical information:
In response to the publicly declared war on Germany by the Jews living in America and Europe, this statement was issued publicly:
“On March 29, 1913, an influential German Jewish Association, the “Central Society of German Citizens of Jewish Faith.”, in a strongly anti-Zionist resolution, declared: “On the soil of the German Fatherland we wish, as Germans, to co-operate in German civilization and to remain true to a partnership that has been hallowed by religion and history.” (Wickham Steed, “The Hapsburg Monarchy”, p. 177)
The Illuminati documents that were confiscated has them bragging:
“We have got our hands into the administration of the law, into the “conduct of elections, into the press, into liberty of the person, BUT PRINCIPALLY INTO EDUCATION AND TRAINING AS BEING THE CORNERSTONES OF A FREE EXISTENCE.”
We find the source of our perpetually lying politicians in Weishaupt’s instructions to his initiates that they must acquire the habit of talking “backward and forwards, sometimes in one way, sometimes in another so that our real purpose should remain impenetrable to our inferiors…Behold our secret…If in order to destroy all Christianity, all religion, we have pretended to have the sole true religion, remember that the end justifies the means, and that the wise ought to take all the means necessary…”
Once the initiate, who began with the intention of promoting Christianity, reached the highest degree, he found himself under threat of death by his own organization. In a truly Satanic twist, he was informed that the real purpose was destruction of all religion and that he now must take part in this or else, after being questioned as to his intention to betray the Illuminati, the Initiator, “taking a naked sword from the table, the Initiator held the point against the heart of the novice with these words:
“If you are only a traitor and perjurer learn that all our brothers are called upon to arm themselves against you. Do not hope to escape or to find a place of safety. Wherever you are, shame, remorse, and the rage of our brothers will pursue you and torment you to the innermost recesses of your entrails.”
What began with promises of Liberty, ended in heavy chains of bondage.
“Princes and nations shall disappear off the face of the earth. Yes, the time will come when men will have no other laws than the book of nature. This revolution will be the work of the secret societies, and that is one of our great mysteries. The great strength of our Order lies in its concealment; let it never appear in any place in its own name, but always covered by another name, and another occupation.” (Robison’s Proofs of a Conspiracy, p. 195)
Feudalism was based on cooperation between people who shared blood ties and common history. To destroy the concept of Feudalism, the very definition of it has been made to change over time. Discredited today by false associations, in reality it was a free and functional system for many centuries which allowed France to become the greatest nation on Earth at that time. Only in the latter days was it corrupted by usury, through the purchase of titles which had formerly been limited by bloodline, and because of illegitimate children of the nobility and their descendants who often assassinated members of the legitimate families in the competition for wealth and power. There is actually no way to understand history without understanding that illegitimate children of the nobility were at war against the legitimate offspring.
A gradual migration of these legitimate families toward the New World contributed to the erosion of Feudalism which led to introduction of Nationalism, whose ties are not dependent on deep intertwined family roots, but rather on an elected central government that functions through deception.
The writer Robison who studied all the evidence sums up the plan of Weishaupt as revealed by them:
“They intended to root out all religion and all morality, to break the bonds of domestic life by destroying veneration for marriage vows and by taking the education of children out of the hands of the parents, abolish inheritance, private property, monarchy, government, in short, civilization.”
The following item explains how the Expulsion of the Acadians from Nova Scotia, who were the extended family of the Catholic Nobility, was accomplished by poisoning King George III:
[Last Updated: Tuesday, 13 July, 2004, 23:36 GMT 00:36 UK]
King George III: Mad or misunderstood?
King George’s wigs were laden with arsenic.
Last year a remarkable exhibit came to light. Hidden in the vaults of a London museum was a scrap of paper containing a few strands of hair. The paper was crudely fashioned into an envelope but the words on it immediately caused a stir: “Hair of His Late Majesty, King George 3rd.”
For Professor Martin Warren, it was the clue that would help him finally solve the mystery of King George’s illness. His investigation is featured in a BBC documentary, Medical Mysteries. “King George is largely remembered for those periods when he lost his mind. But it’s been difficult to explain these attacks, so I was keen to analyze this hair sample,” said Professor Warren. When the hair was tested by the Harwell International Business Centre for Science & Technology in Didcot, Oxfordshire, the results were surprising.
The king’s hair was laden with arsenic. It contained over 300 times the toxic level. “This level is way above anything we were expecting – it’s taken us completely by surprise.” In King George’s time, his bizarre behaviour and wild outbursts were treated as insanity. He was bound in a straitjacket and chained to a chair to control his ravings.
Today, this strategy is global.
Poisoning a Nation:
Sodium fluoride has been shown to cause a dose-dependent decrease in the amount of DNA replication in cultured WI-38 (human) cells (Skare et al.,1986b). Fluoride ion is known to inhibit many enzymes, and any effects of fluoride on DNA or chromosomes are more likely the result of fluoride inhibition of DNA repair or replication enzymes than of interaction of fluoride with DNA itself (Cole et al., 1986; Skare et al., 1986b). It is also known to form hard calcium deposits on soft tissue such as that in the brain and arteries and therefore could be the source of many modern diseases such as Alzheimers. So clearly mass poisoning is possible and profitable to a few, not to mention part of an on-going strategy of a secret society.
In 1786 or shortly thereafter, The Bavarian Government printed all of the papers that were discovered into a publication entitled: “Original Writing of the Order of the Illuminati” and forwarded to every government in Europe, but apparently the schemes were too outrageous to be taken seriously at the time.
Weishaupt took refuge with one of his royal adepts, the Duke of Saxe-Gotha, from whom descend all of the present day royalty of Europe and, judging by the portraits that I’ve studied, probably almost every American president. Zwack went to England.
It was the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family, the current British royals, that had sponsored the rise of Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Illuminati, originally a Freemasonry offshoot, in Bavaria in the 18th century. Weishaupt was born and raised in the Bavarian town of Gotha. It was mainly through the Duke of Saxe-Gotha that the Illuminati were able to infiltrate. Examination of the facial structure in paintings of the nobility reveals a distinct change starting around this time. Queen Charlotte of England is an important starting point, apparently of negro blood judging by her facial features, her relationship to the English royals at the time appears to be through her family’s involvement in delivering up victims to the slave trading Rothschild family, though this is still under investigation. It is a fact that the Arab Jewish slave traders did not enter the heart of Africa but received the victims from African agents who had captured them. The fact that the Jewish Rothschild family and their agents were the engine behind the slave trade has been a well-kept secret until the advent of the internet.
Certain of the important Christian families are not noted in modern history books because they have always been enemies of the Illuminati. Their names are changed in genealogies, misspelled, ignored or slandered in history books. One example of this is the Berard or Berardi family who created and promoted Christian fee-based banking and used the Knights Templar for this purpose. Another example is the leader of the first Crusade, Raymond (Rahman) de Barras, Count of Toulouse. The family descended from the Umayyad prince, a blond haired, freckled face man named Abd al-Rahman I,the Eagle of Damascus whose mother had been Christian. The Ummayads are said to be descendants of the same family as Muhammad.
Abd Ar-Rahman ibn Mu’awiya ibn Hisham ibn Abd al-Malik (in Arabic, عبدالرحمن بن معاوية بن هشام بن عبد الملك) barely escaped with his life from Damascus when a faction, led by Sinan and claiming to be Muslim but actually Jewish, seized power and killed his family. This was at a time when both Christian and Muslim had been living peacefully together in Syria, with no real distinction between them, as the Koran itself is not actually anti-Christian in it’s true translation.
He made his way to Spain arriving in 756 AD, fought important battles in alliance with the Christians there who were related to him through his mother, to clear the way for true Muslims to settle Spain and areas along the Mediterranean, a place called Al Andalouis, where various religions co-existed peacefully. He and his descendants established a thriving economy based on cloth weaving, animal husbandry, agriculture and international commerce. Though his mother is referred to as a Berber, the actual name would be Berard or Berars.
Suppressed or slandered in history books, the Counts Berard or Berardi, always misspelled as Bardi or the Bardi Company of the Middle Ages. Closely associated with the Knights Templar, they invented many modern banking concepts and gave us the Renaissance through the Medici line. In Louisiana much later, as the Berard, Broussard and Grevemburg families descend from this house, leaders in many areas, most notably a humane system of establishing freed slave families before the war by giving them forty acres, a mule and a plow, per family in exchange for working the plantation half time. It was precisely the Civil War that put an end to this project at Albania Plantation. The land that would have belonged to the freed negro families is now owned by a ‘corporation’. That’s a story for another time.
Another thoroughly censored family is de Beausoleil. Unjustly imprisoned in the early 1600’s, with their children, were the young Baron and Baroness de Beausoleil who were experts in locating silver and gold mines. Mine locations worldwide were identified by them and were to be the property of the people of France. French disinformation today calls Beausoleil ‘a foreigner’ because he was the Duke of Brabant, but anyone familiar with this time period knows that this was one of many titles held by the Kings of the French Loire Valley, specifically the family called Gautier, the family of King Francis. All of these mines are still stolen property, both in France and worldwide.
It’s very likely that the Baroness de Beau Soleil ended up in Acadia as Martine Gautier. An important Acadian document that is published in the book “Acadian Miracle’, when enlarged and increased to high contrast, shows clearly that the word ‘DIT’ has been crudely forged over the word De in the name Joseph De Beau Soleil, leader of the last group of Acadians who arrived in Louisiana. The reason for this forgery is to cover up the ‘Noble’ lineage of the Acadians, or to conceal property claims, or rulership rights. The lie is that the word ‘Dit’ refers to a nick name, which, if this were true, then every member of some of these large families would have had the same nickname. ‘ Noble’ refers to Christian lineage, probably descendants of Christ, whereas ‘Aristocrat’ refers to anyone who was able to purchase a title or estate using fiat money during the final days of European Christendom or later.
Then of course there is the unforgettable Jan Sobiesky III, the great King of Poland whose history has been suppressed but who certainly lives on as a constellation in the sky that was named for him. His wife was also a member of the noble families of the Loire, and probably Queen Marie De Medici who married King Henry IV of Navarre, but this is not made clear and one wonders why. The accomplishments of these families are not noted in the history books because they were promoters of Christianity. Where they are mentioned, it’s with disinformation and slander.
What happened to their descendants?
In 1640 was published ‘Les Vrais Pourtrait de Quelques unes des plus grandes Dames de la Chrestient`e, desguisees en Bergeres” By Crispijn de Passe II. This translates as “The True Portraits of Some of the Greatest Ladies of Christendom, Disguised as Shepherdesses”. Another book: Batavische Arcadai was published 3 years earlier.
The author states: ‘…I saw fit to dress them as shepherdesses with their names hidden or enigmatic, so as not to fall easily into the clutches of censors…”
They are us. It is this hidden noble bloodline that constitutes the true greatness of America. We are mostly unaware of it because our ancestors were forced into hiding. This is the meaning of that famous painting by Poussin, “The Shepherds of Acadie”. The British Lords of Trade, the Rothschilds that is, were able to attempt the genocide of these Christian families once again in the mid-1750’s in what is called the ‘Expulsion of the Acadians’ in Nova Scotia. This melodrama is served up to us as a substitute for the fact that the Acadian Forts and Strongholds were sold out by their governors who were blood related to each other, and it was all an Illuminati cowardly betrayal of the “Corps de Fue” of Joseph Broussard de Beau Soleil who settled in Louisiana.
In a letter of Quintin Crawford to Lord Auckland on May 23, 1793, quoted on page 50:
“Hitherto, the basis of human polity was religion, the Supreme Being was everywhere adored, and the great maxims of morality respected; but when the order of civil society had attained a degree of perfection unknown in former ages, we see endeavors almost everywhere put into practice to destroy it. Atheism rising against religion, anarchy against government, vagabonds against the industrious, men who have nothing to lose against those who enjoy what they received from their ancestors or acquired by their labor, and this conflict brought at last into the field to be decided by the sword.”
“Weishaupt’s main themes were to demolish all kings and nobles, all Republics, all laws, all civil codes, all fear of retribution for evil deeds and to substitute for this the ‘religion of reason’. For this to occur, both family and national life must cease to exist, along with all Catholics.
Weishaupt, in a direction given to the Heirophants of the Illuminati writes:
‘At the moment when men united themselves into nations they ceased to recognize themselves under a common name. Nationalism or National Love took the place of universal love. With the division of the globe and its countries benevolence restricted itself behind boundaries that it was never again to transgress. Then it became a virtue to spread out at the expense of those who did not happen to be under our dominion.
Then, in order to attain this goal, it became permissible to despise foreigners, and to deceive and to offend them. This virtue was called Patriotism. That man was called a Patriot, who, whilst just towards his own people, was unjust to others, who blinded himself to the merits of foreigners and took for perfections the vices of this own country. So one sees that Patriotism gave birth to Localism, to the family spirit, and finally to Egoism. Thus the origin of states or governments of civil society was the seed of discord and Patriotism found its punishment in itself…Diminish, do away with this love of country, and men will once more learn to know and love each other as men, there will be no more partiality, the ties between hearts will unroll and extend’. (Nachtrag…Originalschriften) des Illuminaten Ordens), Zweite Abtheilung, p. 65)
“In these words”, writes Webster, “are the purest expression of Internationalism as it is expounded today. Rousseau had merely paved the way for revolution; Weishaupt constructed the actual machinery of revolution itself.”
To understand how absurd ‘National Patriotism’ is, study any pre-1800 map to see how recent and arbitrary national boundaries are, how contrary they are to true cultural identity.
“Women also were to be enlisted as Illuminati by being given hints of emancipation. “to win them over should be one of our cleverest studies. More or less they can all be led towards change by vanity, curiosity, sensuality, and inclination. From this can one draw much profit for the good cause. This sex has a large part of the world in its hands.” (Neuesten Arbeitung des Spartacus und Philo, vi. 139.)
“The female adepts were then to be divided into two classes, each with its own secret, the first to consist of virtuous women who would give an air of respectability to the Order, the second of “light women”, who would help to satisfy those brothers who have a penchant for pleasure”. But the present utility of both classes would consist in providing funds for the society. Fools with money, whether men or women, were to be particularly welcomed…”but let us beware of telling them our secrets, this sort of people must always be made to believe that the grade they have reached is the last.” (Barruel, Memoires sur le Jacobinisme, iii. 28, quoting Originalschriften.)
Webster quoting the words of Prudhomme:
“The French Revolution did a great deal of good to the Jews; it entirely proscribed that antiquated prejudice which caused the remains of this ancient people to be regarded as a race of degraded men below all others…what did they do to show their gratitude? What they did before; they have not changed, they have not mended their ways, they contributed not a little to the fall of ‘assignats’ [fiat money results in the loss of property through it’s planned devaluation]. The disorder of our finances was a Peruvian mine for them; they have not abated their infamous traffic; on the contrary, civil liberty has only availed them to extend their stock-jobbing speculations. Public misery became a rich patrimony to them…The Government had need of them, and God knows how dearly they have made the Republic pay the resources that it demanded of them. What mysteries of iniquity would be revealed if the Jews, like moles, did not make a point of working in the dark! In a word, and to say all, the Jews have never been more Jews than since we tried to make of them men and citizens.”
(Crimes de la Revolution, iii. 44…footnote of Webster: Burke relates that the Jews made large profits out of the plunder of the Churches, and that he is told “the very sons of such Jew-jobbers have been made bishops, persons not to be suspected of any Christian superstition” (Reflections on the French Revolution, p. 254). This may explain the apostacy of certain prelates on the 8th of November 1793.
In the well-known letter that the famous new Messianer Baruch Levy sent to Karl Marx, which was discovered in the year 1888 and published for the first time in the same year. The text is as follows:
“The Jewish people as a whole is its own Messiah. Its kingdom over the universe is obtained through the uniting of the other human races, through the suppression of frontiers and of monarchies, which are bulwarks for particularism and hinder the erection of a world republic where citizenship is everywhere recognized to the Jew. In this new organization of mankind, the sons of Israel, who at present are scattered over the entire earth surface, will all be of the same race and of the same traditional culture, without, however, forming another nationality, and will be without contradiction the leading element in all parts, particularly if it is successful in laying upon the masses of workers a permanent leadership by some Jews. The governments of peoples all pass with the formation of the universal republic effortlessly into the hands of the Israelites in favour of the victory of the proletariat. Then the personal property of the rulers will be able to be suppressed by the rulers of the Jewish race who will everywhere govern over the property of the Peoples. Then the promise of the Talmud will be fulfilled, that when the time of the Messiah has come, the Jews will have the goods of all peoples of the world in their possession.”
…After the French defeat of 1870 and the fall of the Emperor Napoleon III, the Marxists, led by Karl Marx from London, formed the Commune from the 18th March 1871 onwards. In Paris the National Guard had been transformed into mercenary soldiers in the pay of the Marxist International. This situation had first begun 100 years earlier.
When the Commune could not resist the attack of the troops of the government, with its seat at Versailles, and the Communists saw their defeat as unavoidable, they devoted themselves to robbery, murder and incendiarism, in order to destroy the capital, in accordance with the plan already proposed by Clauserets in the year 1869 in this Samson Option of the time:
“Ourselves or nothing! I promise you, Paris will belong to us or cease to exist.”
Upon this occasion was clearly revealed the joint guilt of the French Jewish bankers together with the Communists, when it is established how Salluste in his book “Les origines sécrètes du bolchevisme” [Secret Origins of Bolshevism] alludes to the fact that Rothschild played both sides of the war. He exercised pressure on one side in Versailles with Thiers, the President of the republic, in order to prevent a decisive fight against the Marxist Communists, and on the other side enjoyed a total protection of his person as also of his property in the city of Paris by his control of the National Guard [the Federals], while the rest of Paris was thrown into a horrible and bloody chaos.
In this respect Salluste tells us in his afore-mentioned work, page 137:
“It is certain that M. Rothschild had good reasons to hold a conciliation possible: his villa in the Rue Saint-Florentin was protected day and night by a guard troop of the Federals (Marxists), who had the task of preventing any plundering. This protective troop was maintained for two months, up to the moment when the great barricade, which was only a few paces away, was taken by the Versailles troops.
“While hostages were shot, the most beautiful palaces of Paris went up in flames and thousands of Frenchmen died as victims of the civil war, it is worth mentioning that the protection granted by the Communists to the…Jewish banker did not cease for a moment.”
But once the Nobility were all either murdered or in exile the result was:
“But it was the peasants who became the chief sufferers from the domination of the Jews. Under the old Regime, the feudal dues had proved oppressive, but in many instances the seigneurs were the benefactors and protectors of their vassals. The Jewish usurer on whom the peasant proprietors now depended to carry on if crops failed or weather proved unpropitious, showed no indulgence.”
“As soon as he” (referring to the peasant in Russia), writes Daniel Stern in describing his own Jewish race’s effect on a Christian society that practices usury, “has entered into commercial relations with this ruse [Eastern European Jewry] race, as soon as he has put his name at the foot of a paper which he has read and re-read without perceiving the hidden clause that does for him, the peasant, in spite of all his finesse, will never succeed in recovering his liberty. Henceforth his activity, his intelligence, the benefits of Providence who sends him rich harvests will profit him nothing, but only his new master. The exorbitant interest on a very small capital will absorb his time, and his labours. Every day he will see the comfort of his family diminish and his difficulties increase. As the fatal day approaches when the debt falls due the somber face of his creditor warns him that he can expect no respite. He must make up his mind, he must go further along the road of perdition, borrow again, always borrow until ruin has been brought about, and fields, meadows, and woods, house, flocks and home all have passed from his industrious hands into the rapacious ones of the usurer” From La Revolution de 1848, by Daniel Stern, ii. 89 (La Comtess d’Agoult)
“Here is the true history of the disinherited, not in France alone, but in Russia, in Austria, in Poland; everywhere that the worker lives by tilling his own soil, the abolition of feudalism has led to the domination of the money-lender, and the money-lender is in most cases a Jew.”
The account given on his journey through White Russia in 1816 by the Grand Duke Nicholas, who, remarks:
“The general ruination of the peasantry of these provinces is attributable to the Jews, who are second in import to the landowners only; by their industries they exploit to the utmost the unfortunate population. They are everything here—merchants, contractors, pothouse-keepers, millers, carriers, artisans, etc., and they are so clever in squeezing and cheating the common people that they advance money on the unsown bread and discount the harvest before the fields are sown. They are regular leeches who suck up everything and completely exhaust this province.” (E.A. Brayley Hodgett’s The Court of Russia in the Nineteenth Century, i. 161).
“If, exasperated by this tyranny, the peasants from time to time have given way to violence and turned on their oppressors, is it altogether surprising?…”
“The industrial worker as well as the peasant found the Jew an exacting taskmaster. It was not only the introduction of machinery that at the beginning of the ninetieth century brought about the speeding up of industry, but the spirit of the new commercialism, which succeeded to the leisurely methods of the Old Regime…
This driving force behind the worker, this spirit of cut-throat competition, was largely attributable to the Jew.”
“In order to appreciate thoroughly the insincerity of Marx with regard to this question, it is only necessary to glance through his book Das Capital and then the work of Werner Sombart on The Jews and Modern Capitolism.”
“The Jew,” as Sombart remarks, “embodied modern Capitalism”, and he goes on to describe, step by step, the building up by Jewish hands of the system which superseded the Old Regime of amicable trading and peaceful industry; he shows the Jew as inventor of advertisement, as the employer of cheap labor, as the principal participant in the stock-jobbing or agiotage that prevailed at the end of the first French Revolution. But it is above all as the usurer that the Jew achieved power. “Modern capitalism”, says Sombart, “is the child of money-lending.”
Karl Marx, was an infiltrator agent working for the wealthy capitalist and industrialist Frederich Engles:
“…On what did Marx live? On the bounty of Frederich Engels, described by the Socialist Guillaume, Secretary of the Internationale, as ‘a rich manufacturer accustomed to regard workmen as machine fodder and cannon fodder.’ (Guillaume, Documents de l’Internatonal, iii. 153)
“His large fortune had been made out of Lancashire cotton spinning, and it was he who supplemented the meager earnings of his collaborator.” (Reminiscences, by H.M. Hyndman, pp. 278, 279)
Webster writes further:
“The great fortune of the Rothschilds was built upon the basis of stealing money and then loaning it until they became the principle loan floaters of the world, and then the first railway kings. The period of 1820 onwards became, as Sombart calls it, the age of the Rothschilds, so that by the middle of the century it was a common dictum, “There is only one power in Europe, and that is Rothschild.”
“How is it that Marx never mentions this in this writings? Simply because he was promoting their interests by fomenting revolution. For the true fact of the matter is that they achieved their wealth not so much by being the best business people, the Medici were best at that, but by being the best assassins of their competition, and what better way to assassinate competitors and steal their goods than by hiding under the cover of a revolution?
There have been many non-jewish leaders who would have done away with the Rothschilds, if they had survived. But centuries upon centuries of poisonings and other forms of violence have assured that the Rothschilds could proceed with their plans of world dominance and genocide of the Christian nobility.
This has left the productive and honest people of the world with no protection on earth, other than the mercy of God. But since our scriptures prohibit usury, both paid and received, we cannot expect God’s mercy if we do not follow the commandments. Neither a borrower nor a lender be. When the Nobility went into hiding, the need to borrow became unavoidable. So the lesson becomes that we should acknowledge goodness and support it. As it is today, the people have been misled to the point where a good, honest person is considered stupid, treated with contempt and marginalized. The Jew needs the weak morals of a Christian in order to exploit the Christian.”
Webster says: “There is no hope for suffering humanity but to repudiate the Revolution and all its works, and to strike out a fresh pate with new hopes, new aims founded not on the dreams of visionaries or the schemes of demagogues but on the true desires of the people”.
That true desire is simply to have the freedom to work at what we love doing and to enjoy the results of that work without having it stolen by those who refuse to work.
“The illuminati are careful to win the sympathy of “those who have a hankering for religion” as they so scornfully put it, by always having a few of their numbers pretend to be Christian. Illuminism is the cult of Satan as it flourished in Bavaria.” Webster writes: “The powers exercised by the modern Illuminati are occult powers and range from hypnotism to black magic, which, since the days of the magician Cagliostro, have always formed part of the stock-in-trade of the sect.”
Cagliostro engineered the slander against Queen Marie Antoinette that led to her death, through the ‘Affair of the Necklace’. The scam is described in detail in Memoirs of Barras, where he explains how Cagliostro hired an actress to pretend that she was Marie Antoinette in order to pull off the scam which involved stealing it from the clueless Cardinal Rohan, while the Queen was oblivious to the whole thing. Thus is can be seen that the use of actors in subversive plots to take over the state treasury is nothing new.
“It is therefore no fantastic theory but the literal truth to say that the present world crisis is a conflict between the powers of good and evil. Christianity is a beleaguered citadel surrounded by the dark forces which have mustered for the supreme onslaught. Only in one way can it be withstood. The words of Joseph de Maistre, who, like Barruel, regarded the French Revolution merely as the first stage in the campaign, must be taken as the battle-cry of the White Army today: ‘The French Revolution is Satanic in its principle and can be only really killed, exterminated, and finished by the contrary principle.’ The Christian principle—that is the force that must be opposed to the Satanic power of the World Revolution…
If the people of our country will but realize the diabolical nature of the conspiracy at work amongst them, the powers of Hell cannot prevail against us. In ignorance and indifference lies our principal danger. Every outbreak of the World Revolution that has so far occurred has been rendered possible by the apathy of the nation in general.
Let the words of Barruel, uttered in the face of the same peril a hundred and twenty five years ago, ring in our ears today:
‘Cease to flatter yourselves. The danger is certain, it is continual, it is terrible, it threatens you all without exception. Keep yourselves, however, from giving way to that kind of terror which is only cowardice and discouragement; for, with all the certainty of the danger, I say to you none the less: Will to be saved and you will be saved…One cannot triumph over a nation that resolves to defend itself. Know how to will as they do and you will have nothing more to fear from them’…”
The way in which the necessary literature is forced on the attention of the public is described in the passage already quoted in the parallels to the “Protocols” :
“We must take care our writers be well puffed and that the reviewers do not depreciate them. Therefore we must endeavor by every means to gain over the reviewers and journalists; and we must also try to gain the booksellers, who in time will see that it is their interest to side with us.”
“Other methods to obtain adherents is exploitation of grievances, promise of power; “The pupils are convinced that the Order will rule the world. Every member therefore becomes a ruler…by this lure the Order will spread.”
“Internationalism, the policy of national suicide advocated by the modern revolutionaries, has been frequently attributed to the Jews, and it is obvious that a race without a country might find the ideas of Internationalism attractive.”
Wickham Steed quotes a letter written in 1905:
“There is a Jewish question and this terrible race means not only to master one of the grandest warrior nations in the world [Germany], but it means and is consciously striving, to enter the lists against the other great race of the north (the Russians), the only one that has hitherto stood between it and its goal of world-power. Am I wrong? Tell me. For already England and France are, if not actually dominated by Jews, very nearly so, while the United States, by the hands of those whose grip they are ignorant of, are slowly but surely yielding to that international and insidious hegemony. Remember that I am half a Jew by blood, but that in all I have power to be I am not. (The Hapsburg Monarchy (1913) p. 169.
“In Austria-Hungary”, the author observes, “the spread of Socialism has been largely the result of Jewish propaganda. Dr. Victor Adler, the founder and leader of the Austrian party, is a Jew, as are many of his followers. In Hungary the party was also founded and inspired by the Jews.”
Webster begins a good point:
“If the history of World Revolution related in this book does not prove that the revolutionary movement for the last 140 years has been the work of a conspiracy whose aims are entirely unconnected with the interest and demands of the people, how are we to account for the following undeniable facts?
- That although the grievances of people over the centuries have varied, the slogans and mottoes used have not. Each uses the same catchwords. [The word ‘freedom’ is always used.]
- The leaders of the movement have never been workers, but have been supported by wealthy patrons.
- The movement has never been concerned for the suffering of those who end up victims of Terrorism
- That each outbreak has occurred not when the cause of the people was hopeless, but on the eve of great reforms. [Barras especially took note of this phenomenon in the French Revolution.]
- That each has been followed not by reform, but by repression, censorship and imprisonment or death to potential real popular leaders. In other words, conditions worsened, but the means for correction were no longer there. [Los Cristeros of Mexico for example]
- New jobs, institutions and innovations end, and the old ones are taken over by invisible forces.”
“The war on the bourgeoisie waged by Marat, Robespierre, Clootz, and Hebert under the influence of the Illuminati is again declared by Freiheit for Dec. 18, 1880: “It is no longer aristocracy and royalty that the people intend to destroy. Here perhaps but a coup de grace or two are yet needed. No, but in the coming onslaught the object is to smite the entire middle class with annihilation.”
Or again: “Extirpate all the contemptible brood! Such is the refrain of the revolutionary song…Science now puts means into our hands which make it possible to arrange for the wholesale destruction of the brutes in a perfectly quiet and business-like fashion,” etc. (Zencher, Anarchism, p. 231)
After the French Revolution left everyone working 12 hour days on starvation wages, the good working people tried to organize for change, but Marx, secret agent for the industrialists, infiltrated to undermine their efforts by introducing violence:
“The revolutionaries of all countries are uniting into an “international Social Revolutionary Working Men’s Association” for the purpose of a social revolution. The Headquarters of the Association is at London, and sub-committees are formed in Paris, Geneva, and New York…it is their duty to collect money for the purchase of poison and arms, as well as to discover places suitable for the construction of mines [bombs], etc. To attain the proposed end, the annihilation of all rulers, ministers of State, nobility, the clergy…any means are permissible, and therefore great attention should be given specially to the study of chemistry and the preparation of explosives, as being the most important weapons, etc.”
(Zacher, Die Rothe Internationale, p. 27)
On page 191 is an excerpt from a letter to Gouginot Des Mousseaux received from a Protestant statesman:
“Since the revolutionary recrudescence of 1845, I have had relations with a Jew who, from vanity, betrayed the secret of the secret societies with which he had been associated, and who warned me eight or ten days beforehand of all the revolutions which were about to break out at any point in Europe. I owe to him the unshakeable conviction that all these movement of “oppressed people”’ etc, etc, are devised by half a dozen individuals, who give their orders to the secret societies all over Europe. The ground is absolutely mined beneath our feet, and the Jews provide a large contingent of these miners. The Jewish bankers will soon be, through their prodigious fortunes, our lords and masters. All the great Radical newspapers of Germany are in the hands of Jews…
The ruse of the conspiracy is to use words with a double meaning, and not only this, but with meanings diametrically opposed to each other. Thus freedom means slavery, equality of the sexes means degradation of women, democracy means dictatorship, communism means the seizure of all private property for the Jewish elite.”
Confiscation of property is an essential element of ‘engineered’ revolution:
“The following is a quote from a [an official] Cheka announcement in the Kuban region: “Cossack villages and settlements, which give shelter to Whites and Greens [Ukrainian nationalists], will be destroyed, the entire adult population — executed, and all property — confiscated.” (Solzenitzen at http://jewise.wordpress.com/chapter-16/trackback/)
How does a revolution play out? Victor Hugo’s Les Miserables, unabridged version describes what came of it in France. Here is the short version:
Pg. 65: “Food, owing to four years of war and seven of revolution was at famine princes, the destruction of commerce…had raised all the commodities of life to the same prohibitive level and created vast unemployment. Meanwhile the newly rich, the war profiteers, the army contractors, the adventurer who had made their fortunes out of the Revolution, reveled in luxury, their wives and mistresses swathed in pearls and diamonds, and little else besides, flaunted their charms and opulence before the hungry eyes of the poor.”
In the book “Strange True Tales of Louisiana” by George Washington Cable, Alix de Morainville wrote of her escape from France. Her mother, for fear of arrest could not withdraw the jewelry and savings that were deposited in the Bank of France before she fled. This was right after both Alix’s father and husband had been among the very first victims of the guillotine.
“For every aristocrat thus victimized, the Bank of France confiscated the private wealth of the nation. In Russia, while Marx was promoting Communism, his employer Engles was investing confiscated wealth in the New York Stock Exchange.”
In France “A secret Directorate had been set up to butcher the actual Directorate along with anyone who tried to resist. They had on their side 4500 soldiers and 6000 police who had been promised ‘booty’, that is, they could keep what ever they stole during the chaos. All supplies to the capitol were to be seized, the wealthier people were to be driven from their homes which would then be given to ‘the poor’. All was then to belong to Babeauf and his cabal. It is thanks to a man named Grisel, who had unintentionally been drawn into this, and feared to make himself known as an enemy to the conspiracists, who discovered the plan and informed the Directorate and averted the massacre.”
Paul Barras, member of the Directory, describes in interesting detail how he averted this coup in his ‘Memoirs of Barras’. He writes,
“The conspiracy intended to destroy industry in order to own it after the smoke cleared. Already the destruction of the aristocracy had thrown numberless workers on the streets so that by 1791 nearly all the hands that had provided hairdressing, gilders, bookbinders, tailors, embroiderers, and servants wandered about Paris and collected in crowds. The unemployment of these people led to the unemployment of others. Church holidays were abolished so that about 40 more workdays were added to those who still had work.”
Revolution as Population Reduction
A correspondence discovered stated:
“Monsieur de la Metherie assured me that during the time of the Revolutionary Tribunals, it was a serious contemplation to reduce the population of France to 14,000,000. Dubois Crance was a very distinguished and enthusiastic partisan of this human and philosophical policy (France in 1802, Letters of Redhead Yorke, edited by JAC Sykes (Heinemann,) 1906, pp. 102, 127 The actual goal was to bring the population down to 8 million, from 25 million at that time, or as it was said, to 1/3 of the present at that day.”
False news and advertising as a means of agitating war:
“The most remarkable instance of engineered agitation during the early stages of the Revolution was the extraordinary incident known to history as “the Great Fear”, when on the same day, July 22, 1789, and almost at the same hour, in towns and villages all over France, a panic was created by the [false] announcement that brigands were approaching and therefore all good citizens must take up arms. The messengers who brought the news poste haste on horseback in many cases exhibited placards headed “Edict of the King” bearing the words, “The King orders all chateaux to be burnt down, he only wishes to keep his own!”. And the people obedient to these commands, seized upon every weapon they could find and set themselves to the task of destruction.” [though the King had not actually issued the edict]
Marquise de Custine who traveled Russia after the Dakabrist uprising wrote:
“Well informed people have attributed this riot to the influence of the Secret Societies by which Russia is worked…The method that the conspirators had employed to rouse the army was a ridiculous lie; the rumor had been spread that Nicholas was usurping the throne form his brother Constantine, who, they said was advancing on Petersburg to defend his rights by armed force. This is the means they took in order to decide the revolutionaries to cry under the windows of the Palace: “Long live the Constitution!” The leaders had persuaded them that this word Constitution was the name of the wife of Constantine, their supposed Empress. You see that an idea of duty was at the bottom of the soldiers’ hearts, since they could only be led into rebellion by a trick.”
Another intercepted letter written by secret agent:
“…the fall of thrones is no longer a matter of doubt to me now that I have just studied the work of our societies in France, in Switzerland, in Germany and as far as Russia…In order to kill the old world surely, we have held that we must stifle the Catholic and Christian germ…”
Webster concludes that: “The corruption and arrogance of government officials is an absolute necessity for these destructive policies to work. In vain de Tocqueville warned the Chamber of Deputies wither this state of public affairs would lead them. He wrote in 1846: “Let us seek in history the efficacious causes that have taken away power from the governing classes; they lost it when they became by their egoism unworthy to retain it…The evils I point out will bring about the gravest revolutions.”
“Corrupt and selfish politicians will always be the most useful allies of Anarchists.”
In the year 1916, the Lieutenant-General of the Imperial Russian Army, A. Nechvolodof, described secret information which had been received from one of his agents, which on the 15th February of the same year reached the supreme command of the Russian General Staff and read as follows:
“The first secret assembly, which reveals the beginning of the acts of violence, took place on Monday, the 14th February, in the East Side of New York. Of the 62 representatives gathered, 50 were veterans of the revolution of 1905, and the others new members. The greater part of those present were Jews and among them many educated people, as for example, doctors, writers, etc… Some professional revolutionaries were also found amongst them…
“The first hours of this assembly were almost exclusively devoted to testing the methods and the possibilities of carrying out a great revolution in Russia. It was one of the most favourable moments for this.
“It was stated that the party had just received information from Russia, according to which the situation was completely and absolutely favourable; for all previously agreed conditions for a favourable rising were present. The one serious hindrance was the question of money; but scarcely was this remark made, when several members at once answered that this circumstance should cause no reflection, for, at the moment when it was necessary, substantial sums would be given by persons who sympathised with the movement for freedom. In this connection the name of Jakob Schiff was repeatedly mentioned.” (http://www.catholicvoice.co.uk/pinay/) [Jacob Schiff has been identified as the patriarch of what is now known as the Bush family. He is also implicated in the death and theft of documents of Nicolas Tesla.]
Woodrow Wilson, 28th U.S. PRESIDENT 1913-21 In reference to passing of the Federal Reserve Act said:
“A great industrial Nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the Nation and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the world-no longer a Government of free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men.”
He also said,
“I have been deceived.”
“I have betrayed my country.”
After he was denied broadcasting time in the U.S., Dr. Ezra Pound broadcast from Italy in an effort to persuade people of the United States not to enter World War II. Franklin D. Roosevelt personally ordered Pound’s indictment, which was demanded by his three personal assistants, Harry Dexter White, Lauchlin Currie, and Alger Hiss, all of whom were subsequently identified as being connected with Communist/Jewish espionage. It was Dr. Pound, while imprisoned in a Federal mental institute, who paid Eustace Mullins to do the first research on the origins and true nature of the Federal Reserve.
The resulting book was censored in the United States so Mullins went abroad to have it published. The burning of the entire edition of 10,000 books in Germany was upheld April 21, 1961 by judge Israel Katz of the Bavarian Supreme Court.
Weishaupt, in a direction given to the Heirophants of the Illuminati writes:
“At the moment when men united themselves into nations they ceased to recognize themselves under a common name… Then it became a virtue to spread out at the expense of those who did not happen to be under our dominion.” (Nachtrag…Originalschriften) des Illuminaten Ordens), Zweite Abtheilung, p. 65)
Weishaupt further explained to his agents that by replacing Feudalism with Nationalism, it becomes permissible to despise foreigners, and to deceive and to offend them. This virtue is called Patriotism. Practicing justice towards your own people, while unjust to others, blinded to the merits of foreigners, Patriotism is an element of centralized states or governments, something that did not exist in its present form during Feudal times.
“In these words”, writes Webster, “are the purest expression of Internationalism as it is expounded today. Rousseau had merely paved the way for revolution; Weishaupt constructed the actual machinery of revolution itself.” Patriotism is nothing more than the Talmudic doctrine of tribal supremacy and moral relativism, the exact opposite of the Christian doctrine.
The goal of these revolutionary machinations was to replace Feudalism, a system originally based on mutual cooperation of extended family networks, to be replaced with a centrally controlled aristocracy. The difference between Nobility and Aristocracy is what? The aristocracy can be traced to the emerging branch of illegitimate children of the Nobility, the nouveau riche protestants who sought to destroy the old order. These families intermarried over time, and had the interesting common denominator of all being Rothschild family members on the mother’s side. The Nobility were Catholic, the Aristocracy was not. Feudalism went hand in hand with Catholicism. Capitalism does not.
The Rothschilds fueled the power of the Aristocracy through control of the fiat money supply and the raw power of a mercenary following. The Catholic Nobility, on the other hand, had relied on a voluntary army whose allegiance was to the survival of the community. After the fall of Catholicism, mercenary followings would now be the norm.
The success of the Feudal system rested on the willingness of the Nobility to act in a Christian manner. It was this Nobility that the Illuminati sought to destroy, as part of the effort to destroy Christianity and establish an atheist Empire. When the Russian ruling family began making concessions to integrate the Jews into Christian society, the results were a genocide of 60 million Christians, whose deaths at the hands of Jewish Bolsheviks occurred in a variety of ways over a period of several generations. This is censored history but Alexander Solzhenitsyn writes about it.
Many traitorous secret agents in history are deemed to be important historical figures whose ideas are a basic requirement for a University degree at present.
Masonic Sword for Lafayette, Louisiana. In their published statements, they proudly claim responsibility for our educational system which thoroughly eliminates any mention of early true Acadian history, ancestry or accomplishments. They implemented the system whereby native French speaking children were beaten for speaking their own language in the public schools. However, equally victimized were the young school teachers who were told to do this, one of whom confessed to me on her deathbed 60 years later. She felt terrible about having done this, she told me, and she died the next day.
University students now actually have to pay to take classes to learn about Karl Marx:
“…On what did Marx live? On the bounty of Frederich Engels, described by the Socialist Guillaume, Secretary of the Internationale, as ‘a rich manufacturer accustomed to regard workmen as machine fodder and cannon fodder.’ (Guillaume, Documents de l’Internatonal, iii. 153)
Karl Marx, was an Illuminati infiltrator agent working for the Industrialists to sabotage the Labor movement. The immediate result of this welcoming of Talmudic Jews into a Christian society is described here:
“See the account given on his journey through White Russia in 1816 by the Grand Duke Nicholas, who, remarks:
“The general ruination of the peasantry of these provinces is attributable to the Jews… [non-Christian money-lenders], who are second in import to the landowners only; by their industries they exploit to the utmost the unfortunate population. They are everything here—merchants, contractors, pothouse-keepers, millers, carriers, artisans, etc., and they are so clever in squeezing and cheating the common people that they advance money on the unsown bread and discount the harvest before the fields are sown…
They are regular leeches who suck up everything and completely exhaust this province.”
(E.A. Brayley Hodgett’s The Court of Russia in the Nineteenth Century, i. 161).
When Tsar Nicholas of Russia refused to heed warnings, and instead naively continued to give protection to undermining forces, he is described in this way by Mikhail Rodzianko, Russian, 1959-1944: “There is not one honest man in your entourage; all decent people have left” …The Tzar is said to have pressed his head with his hands and said:
“Is it possible that for twenty two years I have tried to do some good, and that for twenty two years I have failed?…Yes Your Majesty, for twenty two years you have followed the wrong trail”.