The Vatican Occupied

Are we being tricked into participating in Satanic conjurations when we attend the Novus Ordo mass?

Canon Lawyer Father Gregory explained clearly the legal situation of the present usurpers, and why they are usurpers and not Catholic, but he spoke long before Francis arrived at the Vatican.  This is important, because the orderliness of the Catholic Church, an institution that has lasted 2000 years, is dependent upon strict adherence to Divine Law at all times, but most importantly at times of emergency.

The laws of the Catholic Church are the only laws left to us by the forefathers of Catholic people.  The Constitution is a humanist and therefore ultimately pagan document, when looked at through a theological microscope. It is a Protestant document, doomed from day one, and this is explained in detail by Bishop Williamson at a conference held in Austin.

When Bishop Williamson spoke of misconceptions about the holocaust, he became a victim of severe Bolshevik persecution. He no longer uses the word Jew.

St. Andrews in Scotland
St. Andrews in Scotland

Most of the ruins that we see in the Middle East and throughout Europe are ruins of the Christian Empire. We are now in the Post-Christian Empire, one that can only be described as Pagan, replete with child sacrifice in the form of abortion and surrogacy, along with a celebration and promotion of a variety of perversions of nature too long to list here, and need I mention usury and gambling in the form of insurance, all not only sponsored by the government but forced upon us by law.

That this is forced upon the majority (Mensheviks) by the minority (Bolsheviks) is cause for greater celebration by the Bolsheviks.  A large part of the joy of the Bolsheviks is the power trip.

Understand the meanings and sources of the words, and you understand who has taken power, and thereby increase your own power to resist.

Why did Rome not fall? 

Each Roman Province had a Pontif.  As the population of Rome migrated toward the provinces, so did the power of Rome decentralize.  The city of Rome lost its importance, the Empire of Rome spread out and moved its capitol to Constantinople, the great Christian city described in many texts, whose entrance gate had a giant sculpture of the face of Jesus.

The custom had always been, from ancient Roman times, that all the Pontiffs of all the provinces would be subject to the Pontiff who resides in the capitol.  When the Roman capitol moved to Constantinople, it became the seat of the Pontifex Rex, the Patriarch.  All of the other Pontiffs were still called Pontiffs, that was the name carried over from the Roman, the root word being Pons, which signifies the priest who receives the sacrifices and administers the rituals and property of the Temple and administers the local law as it relates to societal behavior.

The completion of the present St. Peters signified the movement of the capitol back to Rome.

Whether the Pontiff was in the East or in the West, the unity of the church was represented by adherence to the liturgy as it was defined at Constantinople many times over the centuries, in councils generally called by Emperors, not Popes.

Knowing this, you understand that within the established system, there had always been many Pontiffs, so to call yourself ‘Papa’ or whatever version at that time would not have been an affront to the Pontifex Rex, as long as everyone had the same liturgical and baptismal rites.

Over the centuries the ancient Roman temples were gradually adapted to Christianity and codified and thus we have the Roman Catholic Church, One Baptism, One Church with roots that disappear in the mists of time long before Christ’s death on the cross.

Roman Catholicism began when Christianity overcame Paganism through the choice of the people, who were largely the family of the Pontiffs. One of the first symbolic steps taken by the new Christian power, and one which defined it, was the freeing of Roman slaves. Thus, we can see that the first idea of ending slavery began with white Christians.  At that time, it was no secret that Khazarian tribes were slave merchants.  Also at that time, most slaves were white.

When we don’t know the history, we fall victim to lies and place the entire community, the next generation in grave danger.  Our ability to discern truth is based on our ability to get correct information.  Our ability to discern truth also comes with our acknowledgement of God our Father, who has invited us to be his children, to enter his kingdom freely as heirs.

Modern Islam has a custom of calling its followers slaves.  But a slave is not allowed to enter the Master’s house. Only the Master’s children can enter the house. We are called to enter as free and rational human beings who have weighed the evidence and judged the situation righteously, true children of the one God.

Humanism makes a god of every man and such a multiplication of gods is the dysfunctional cacophony that we know today.  The ancient liturgical rite is a unified voice that results in a harmonious song and a focus of energy that commands the casting away of Satan. The precise words of the liturgy, that is to say, the incantations of the ritual, are not randomly chosen, ask any practicing Satanist.

It is written by the prophets that even the elect will be fooled…

In March of 2015, Bishop Williamson, who had withdrawn from the usurpers in the Vatican consecrated Bishop Faure.

Having been ordained and taught by Bishop Lefebvre, Bishop Williamson rejected the ‘Conciliar Church’ as a schismatic church that presently occupies church property illegally and is illegally disposing of this property at a rapid pace.  This is happening while most Catholics are unaware that they are now members of a Protestant religion, heretical to the core, and Satanic in it’s application.

Bishop Williamson and Pope Michael represent the what remains of the heirarchy of the Catholic Church, those people motivated by the Holy Spirit.  Their mission is to maintain the liturgy and doctrine of our 2000 year Catholic heritage.  These people are supposedly being “excommunicated” by heretics who occupy the buildings that we call the Vatican, but true Catholics are not fooled by this.

“In the spiritual reality of the church, neither Marcel Lefebvre, nor his bishops and priests, nor the people who frequent the SSPX chapels suffered or suffer excommunication. I believe history will record that the intent to impose such an excommunication was invalid and illicit.”
Father Malachi Martin

[Father Martin has been doubted by Father Gregory Hesse, and I myself once located an article published in Minnesota which identified Malachi Martin as an agent of those who are enemies of the church. I can only say for certain that his early writings pointed out the exact word for word transcription of the Communist Manifesto into Vatican II with only the change of labeling words.]

The followers of Bishop Williamson represent what remains of the body of the true church established by Jesus.

the importance of control of the vatican

To consider the supernatural aspects of liturgy, one realizes that we are speaking of ‘spells’.  If the Satanists are conjuring up the devil, and if they are inserting their word combinations into our rituals, then we are being tricked into participating in their conjurations when we attend the Novus Ordo mass. This is what Bishop Williamson, the Bishop in Exile, has been so strongly warning us about. Do not stay there, he says, with reason.  Do not add your energy to this, even with the best of intentions, it’s still wrong, now that you’ve been told.

Exiles Seeking Sanctuary is a frequent theme of Poussin's art. Here the tomb says,
Exiles Seeking Sanctuary is a frequent theme of Poussin’s art. Here the tomb says, “I am in Acadia”. Not exactly cryptic.

The Divine Theophany: The full heritage of the Middle Eastern Catholic church is condensed in this video of a Christian song sung in Arabic with English translation and images of Christian architecture and artwork in various places throughout the Middle East and Egypt.

The history of the unity of the Catholic church is plain to see when we look at details of the Merovingians.  The key word to know is Sicambria for their history.

King Clovis I was the most famous of all the Merovingian rulers, and an important root of Acadian genealogies, but not even mentioned in American public or Catholic schools today.  He ruled between 481 and 511.  He is known widely to French school children as the King who ‘converted’ to Christianity, supposedly setting up a rival church to the one at Constantinople.  In reality, one finds that the members of the same family controlled both Rome and Constantinople and the rivalry is a textbook invention to hide the true physical extent and strength of the unified Christian Roman Empire which covered an immense area from East to West for a period of about 1500 years.

This 1500 year period is mostly removed from public education by enemies of the Catholic Church.  Only home schooled children have the opportunity to learn this, if their parents are aware.

Protestant devastation
The Protestant Reformation: A living church is reformed into a devastated church.

3 thoughts on “The Vatican Occupied

  1. Look here Bishop Williamson contradicts himself here on the New Mass which shows he has NOT rejected the Vehicle for the Conciliar Church as you suggested in your article.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzI4WKwDlPk Bp. Richard Williamson Q&A on the Novus Ordo Mass (June 28, 2015) He admits it is a part of the apostasy yet he tells a woman that she can go to it. He contradicts himself regarding the New Mass. He says the following: The New Mass is a key part of the New Religion and the worldwide apostasy. Stay away from the New Mass!, You can go to the New Mass under certain circumstances. The New Mass is wrong as a whole If it nourishes your Faith, you can go (this “seems” to be the “absolute rule of rules”) You cannot cause scandal by going to the New Mass
    Archbishop Lefebvre said the New Mass is a danger to the Faith. Williamson claims there are Eucharistic miracles in the New Mass. He says, The New Religion, of which the New Mass is a key part, is dangerous and strangles grace. The New Mass can build your Faith. The New Mass does harm in itself. Decide for yourself. Ask a priest you trust and heed his advice — maybe.
    Bishop Williamson is clearly confused. How can a Mass that lends itself to apostasy be something that a Catholic could go to in order to fulfill their Sunday obligation. He believes in the false “Poem of the Man God” and has many other errors. The Novus Ordo is NOT used to build the faith as he said this is totally false. He is an eclectic pragmatist and this is not the attitude that a solid Catholic shepherd. He admits that priests are not always reliable and he is not reliable with this bad advice. Also how can you claim that Bishop Williamson has rejected the Conciliar Religion when he told that woman that she can go to the New Mass which is the vehicle of the New Religion and “you must work it out for yourself?” . Also how can you think that “Pope Michael” who is an anti-pope is a valid pope when he is not? Moreover if you think that Bishop Williamson is someone to follow he would not agree that your “pope Michael” is a pope at all but an anti-pope because he calls Bergoglio the pope. You have some good articles on your site. I think that Williamson is confused but I think you contradict yourself when you think Williamson has rejected the Conciliar Church because he still accepts it in the New Mass and Bergoglio as pope and his relativism which is very apparent in his confusing comments on June 28. 2015 Conference- and “ make your own judgments” when we should be judging according to the teachings of the Catholic Church

    Like

  2. Look here Bishop Williamson contradicts himself here on the New Mass which shows he has NOT rejected the Vehicle for the Conciliar Church as you suggested in your article.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzI4WKwDlPk Bp. Richard Williamson Q&A on the Novus Ordo Mass (June 28, 2015) He admits it is a part of the apostasy yet he tells a woman that she can go to it. He contradicts himself regarding the New Mass. He says the following: The New Mass is a key part of the New Religion and the worldwide apostasy. Stay away from the New Mass!, You can go to the New Mass under certain circumstances. The New Mass is wrong as a whole If it nourishes your Faith, you can go (this “seems” to be the “absolute rule of rules”) You cannot cause scandal by going to the New Mass
    Archbishop Lefebvre said the New Mass is a danger to the Faith. Williamson claims there are Eucharistic miracles in the New Mass. He says, The New Religion, of which the New Mass is a key part, is dangerous and strangles grace. The New Mass can build your Faith. The New Mass does harm in itself. Decide for yourself. Ask a priest you trust and heed his advice — maybe.
    Bishop Williamson is clearly confused. How can a Mass that lends itself to apostasy be something that a Catholic could go to in order to fulfill their Sunday obligation. He believes in the false “Poem of the Man God” and has many other errors. The Novus Ordo is NOT used to build the faith as he said this is totally false. He is an eclectic pragmatist and this is not the attitude that a solid Catholic shepherd. He admits that priests are not always reliable and he is not reliable with this bad advice. Also how can you claim that Bishop Williamson has rejected the Conciliar Religion when he told that woman that she can go to the New Mass which is the vehicle of the New Religion and “you must work it out for yourself?” . Also how can you think that “Pope Michael” who is an anti-pope is a valid pope when he is not? Moreover if you think that Bishop Williamson is someone to follow he would not agree that your “pope Michael” is a pope at all but an anti-pope because he calls Bergoglio the pope. You have some good articles on your site. I think that Williamson is confused but I think you contradict yourself when you think Williamson has rejected the Conciliar Church because he still accepts it in the New Mass and Bergoglio as pope and his relativism which is very apparent in his confusing comments on June 28. 2015 Conference- and “ make your own judgements” when we should be judging according to the teachings of the Catholic Church.

    Like

    1. Kathy, I agree that Pope Michael is not a real Pope at this time, however, there was a point in time when he at least attempted to fill a void and I appreciated his attempts when I wrote that, it’s been quite a while. Suppose he had been the last Catholic alive in a remote location and it all depended on one man’s willingness to carry the faith forward. He made a sincere attempt, but now other priests are coming forward so it seems that he has retired. He doesn’t claim to be Pope anymore, as far as I know. Also, there is certainly plenty of disagreement all around as to whether a Catholic should attend new mass or not. I agree with you that we should not attend Mass, mainly because I personally can’t stand it, now that I know their tricks and how sneaky they are. My appreciation for Bishop Williamson has more to do with his willingness to speak the truth on important historical matters, and I won’t pass judgement on his advice to others. It seems to me that he doesn’t want to be responsible, as a priest, for discouraging Catholics from gathering together with good intention. All I can do is make my own choice and I remember the old Latin Mass and how wonderful it felt to be there. I miss that very much and I feel a righteous anger towards the people who have deprived us all of that experience. Therefore, I focus on the truly guilty perpetrators of this crime against God and Humanity, and don’t spend much time quibbling over the sincere attempts that people make as we all grope our way through this darkness. Thank you for your comment.

      Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.