Religion of Protest

It was General Lafayette who funded the American Revolution and here is his Masonic Sword:

The Masonic Sword of Lafayette.
The Masonic Sword of Lafayette.

Early 1900 Bavarian police files revealed that on the 1st of May 1776 John Adam Weishaupt founded the secret society that he named, “after bygone philosophical systems”, the Illuminati.  This was a German sect professing Satanism which had existed in the 15th century.  Weishaupt chose to propogate his society by copying the methods of the Jesuits, only with a message opposite to that of Christ, “in order to demolish religion by the same means that had been used to establish it on a worldwide basis. “


This engraving is John Adams Weishaupt.  His first two names are John Adams and there are so many John Adams in American history that it’s impossible to name them all.  There is a strong resemblance between the older President Adams and the younger John Adams Weishaupt. Considering the details of their lives, there is every reason to suspect that Weishaupt, founder of the Illuminati, could have also been the second president of the United States using the name John Adams, or perhaps a relative.

John Adams Weishaupt left Bavaria in time to take part in American Revolutionary activities.

His colleagues confessed much after the discovery of a packet of secret letters by the Bavarian police. It is this packet of letters that contained the original document known as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, found on the body of a messenger who’d been struck by lightening.  What the Bavarian police didn’t know at the time was that all the monarchies had already been infiltrated, so nothing was done about the discovery other than cover it up.  The records remained in the police files and were later discovered and included in a book from which I quote the summary:

“If the history of World Revolution related in this book does not prove that the revolutionary movement for the last 140 years has been the work of a conspiracy whose aims are entirely unconnected with the interest and demands of the people, how are we to account for the following undeniable facts?

  • That although the grievances of people over the centuries have varied, the slogans and mottoes used have not. Each uses the same catchwords. [The word ‘freedom’ is always used.]

  • The leaders of the movement have never been workers, but have been supported by wealthy patrons.

  • The movement has never been concerned for the suffering of those who end up victims of Terrorism

  • That each outbreak has occurred not when the cause of the people was hopeless, but on the eve of great reforms.[‘Memoirs of Barras’ especially took note of this phenomenon in the French Revolution.]

  • That each has been followed not by reform, but by repression, censorship and imprisonment or death to potential real popular leaders. In other words, conditions worsened, but the means for correction were no longer there.

  • New jobs, institutions and innovations end, and the old ones are taken over by invisible forces.”


The above portrait is John Adams, the second president of the United States.  Did Weishaupt continued his revolutionary efforts in colonial America?

Adam’s Career as an agent provocateur of the Revolution

Opponent of Stamp Act 1765

Adams first rose to prominence as an opponent of the Stamp Act 1765. He encouraged Americans to protest vehemently that it violated their traditional rights as Englishmen. Popular resistance, he later observed, was sparked by an oft-reprinted sermon of the Boston minister, Jonathan Mayhew, interpreting Romans 13 to elucidate the principle of just insurrection.[22]

In 1765, Adams drafted the instructions which were sent by the inhabitants of Braintree to its representatives in the Massachusetts legislature, and which served as a model for other towns to draw up instructions to their representatives. In August 1765, he anonymously contributed four notable articles to the Boston Gazette (republished in The London Chronicle in 1768 as True Sentiments of America, also known as A Dissertation on the Canon and Feudal Law). In the letter he suggested that there was a connection between the Protestant ideas that Adams’ Protestant Puritan ancestors brought to New England along with ideas behind their resistance to the Stamp Act.

Recent archaeological evidence shows that these Puritan settlers were so corrupt that they ended up shooting each other, one member abandoned the others and left with a ship, and in 2013 an archaeological investigation revealed that they survived by cannibalizing a 14 year old girl.  They were also known to take child brides as young as 8 or 9 years old.  These Puritans do not stand up to scrutiny and we should not be lying to our children about them in school.  The Catholic Settlements in America had already been established long before any Puritan showed up.

Adams Defends British Soldiers Responsible for the Boston Massacre

In 1770, a street confrontation resulted in British soldiers killing five civilians in what became known as the Boston Massacre.[25] The soldiers involved were arrested on criminal charges. Not surprisingly, they had trouble finding legal counsel to represent them. They asked Adams to organize their defense, which he accepted, so we know that he is playing both sides against each other.

Adams a Traitor to his Political Party

John Quincy Adams: The Massachusetts General Court elected Adams as a Federalist to the U.S. Senate soon after, and he served from March 4, 1803, until 1808, when he broke with the Federalist Party. Adams, as a senator, had supported the Louisiana Purchase and Jefferson’s Embargo Act, actions which made him very unpopular with Massachusetts Federalists. The Federalist-controlled Massachusetts Legislature chose a replacement for Adams on June 3, 1808, several months early. On June 8, Adams broke with the Federalists, resigned his Senate seat, and became a Republican.

The next place we find John Adams is Russia. Ever so shortly after his arrival the young son of Tsar Nicholas gets ill.   He arrived in St. Petersburg in October 23, 1809, delayed by an insurrection that just so happened while he was there.  He seems to have a special relationship or secret understanding with Admiral Albermarle [Marlborough] Bertie, a confidante of Queen Victoria.

Adams the Land Grabber

He then returns to the United States and becomes involved in land grabs for Florida, more of French Louisiana territory and Canada.

John Adams Weishaupt, the originator of the Illuminati wrote that:

“Every effort is made to persuade the public that no conspiracy exists, for once its existence is generally recognized its defeat is certain.  Its whole success depends on secrecy.”

“It was on the 11th of October 1786 that the Bavarian authorities descended upon the house of Zwack [an associate of John Adam Weishaupt] and seized the documents which laid bare the methods of the conspirators.  Here were found descriptions of a strong box for safeguarding papers which if forced open should blow up by means of an infernal machine.  Of a composition which would blind or kill if squirted in the face. Of a method for counterfeiting seals, recipes for a particularly deadly kind of “aqua toffina” for poisonous perfumes that would fill a bedroom with pestilential vapours, and for a tea to procure abortion [miscarriage].”

Instructions are given in the art of infiltration, gaining control over a politically powerful individual (or group) by slow poisoning either of the body or the mind, and thus the gradual transformation from a functioning government to a kleptocracy begins.

“The Elector of Bavaria, informed of the danger to the State, published an edict forbidding secret societies.  In 1784, four of the Illuminatus were summoned to court to testify.  Utshchneider, Cossandeym, Grunberger, and Renner were all professors of the Marianen Academy.

“All religion”, declared the Illuminatti, “all love of country and loyalty to sovereigns are to be annihilated.”  Moreover, effort was made to create discord not only between princes and their subjects but between ministers and their secretaries, and even between parents and children, whilst suicide was to be encouraged…Espionage extended even to the post offices by placing adepts who possessed the art of opening letters and closing them again without fear of detection.”

The Jesuits had been kind enough to take on Jewish students as part of their mission to spread Christianity. St. Ignatius words on the original founding document read that their purpose was:

“to strive especially for the defense and propagation of the faith and for the progress of souls in Christian life and doctrine.”

“The illuminati are careful to win the sympathy of “those who have a hankering for religion” as they so scornfully put it, by always having a few of their numbers pretend to be Christian.  Illuminism is the cult of Satan as it flourished in Bavaria.”  Webster writes on page 325:  “The powers exercised by the modern Illuminati are occult powers and range from hypnotism to black magic, which, since the days of the magician Cagliostro, have always formed part of the stock-in-trade of the sect.”

The Protocols are the subversion of a plan that the Jesuits had devised to spread Christianity by offering free education, both primary and advanced, world-wide to any who seek it.    The Jesuit brothers were educated men whose purpose was to spread the Christian way of life, though the order was eventually infiltrated at the upper levels, and perhaps had been from the beginning as a means to infiltrate the Holy Mother Church.  The word propagation is the root of the word propaganda, which can be used for the spreading of good or bad, but the techniques for doing so remain the same.

We can go back thousands of years and find examples of propaganda used to foment a planned ‘revolution’ as a means to create chaos and thereby usurp power.  This is why control of the media is essential for any functioning society, and the message put out by that media can either destroy that society, or it can edify it.  The quality of the message is the key.

Americans are not generally aware that there was a publicly declared war on Germany by the Jews living in America and Europe in 1933, but apparently the same thing had been attempted in 1913. This panicked the Jews inside Germany and so they issued this statement publicly:

“On March 29, 1913, an influential German Jewish Association, the “Central Society of German Citizens of Jewish Faith.”, in a strongly anti-Zionist resolution, declared:  “On the soil of the German Fatherland we wish, as Germans, to co-operate in German civilization and to remain true to a partnership that has been hallowed by religion and history.”  (Wickham Steed, “The Hapsburg Monarchy”,  p. 177)

Yet, the Illuminati documents that were confiscated has them bragging:

“We have got our hands into the administration of the law, into the “conduct of elections, into the press, into liberty of the person, BUT PRINCIPALLY INTO EDUCATION AND TRAINING AS BEING THE CORNERSTONES OF A FREE EXISTENCE.”

We find the source of our perpetually lying politicians in Weishaupt’s instructions to his initiates that they must acquire the habit of talking “backward and forwards, sometimes in one way, sometimes in another so that our real purpose should remain impenetrable to our inferiors…Behold our secret…If in order to destroy all Christianity, all religion, we have pretended to have the sole true religion, remember that the end justifies the means, and that the wise ought to take all the means necessary…”  Once the initiate, who began with the intention of promoting Christianity, reached the highest degree, he was informed that the real purpose was destruction of all religion and after being questioned as to his intention to betray the Illuminati, the Initiator, “taking a naked sword from the table, the Initiator held the point against the heart of the novice with these words:

“If you are only a traitor and perjurer learn that all our brothers are called upon to arm themselves against you.  Do not hope to escape or to find a place of safety.  Wherever you are, shame, remorse, and the rage of our brothers will pursue you and torment you to the innermost recesses of your entrails.”

   “Princes and nations shall disappear off the face of the earth.  Yes, the time will come when men will have no other laws than the book of nature.  This revolution will be the work of the secret societies, and that is one of our great mysteries.  The great strength of our Order lies in its concealment; let it never appear in any place in its own name, but always covered by another name, and another occupation.”  (Robison’s Proofs of a Conspiracy, p. 195)

Part of the strategy was to do away with Feudalism, which was based on humanitarian and direct cooperation between people who shared blood ties and common history.  To destroy the concept of Feudalism, the very definition of it has been changed over time.  Largely discredited today, in reality it was a functional system for many centuries which allowed France to become the greatest nation on Earth at that time.  Only in the latter days was it corrupted by usury, through the purchase of titles, and because of illegitimate children of the nobility.  The entire Protestant rebellion was promoted by illegitimate children and their descendants who often assassinated members of the legitimate families in the competition for wealth and power.  There is actually no way to understand history without understanding that illegitimate children of the nobility were perpetually at war against the legitimate offspring.  The wars were fought to maintain the rules, rights and responsibilities of society, because once the rules are broken, chaos ensues.

A gradual migration of these legitimate families toward the New World contributed to the erosion of Feudalism in Europe and its establishment in Nova Scotia.  But there too, it was eroded by the corruption behind the throne of the British monarchy

Part of the corruption was to promote the Religion of Protest, whose worship was centered on an elected central government that functions through deception and theft.  By claiming God-like rights for each human being, it becomes necessary to have an assembly of representatives which limits the number of people who need to be paid off.  Notice the word “divide” in the word “Individual”.  The Religion of Protest is a “Divide and conquer” strategy.

The writer Robison who studied all the evidence sums up the plan of Weishaupt as revealed by them:

“They intended to root out all religion and all morality, to break the bonds of domestic life by destroying veneration for marriage vows and by taking the education of children out of the hands of the parents, abolish inheritance, private property, monarchy, government, in short, civilization.”

Poisoning a King

[Last Updated: Tuesday, 13 July, 2004, 23:36 GMT 00:36 UK]

King George III: Mad or misunderstood?


King George’s wigs were laden with arsenic.

Last year a remarkable exhibit came to light. Hidden in the vaults of a London museum was a scrap of paper containing a few strands of hair. The paper was crudely fashioned into an envelope but the words on it immediately caused a stir:   “Hair of His Late Majesty, King George 3rd.”

For Professor Martin Warren, it was the clue that would help him finally solve the mystery of King George’s illness. His investigation is featured in a BBC documentary, Medical Mysteries.  “King George is largely remembered for those periods when he lost his mind. But it’s been difficult to explain these attacks, so I was keen to analyze this hair sample,” said Professor Warren. When the hair was tested by the Harwell International Business Centre for Science & Technology in Didcot, Oxfordshire, the results were surprising.

The king’s hair was laden with arsenic. It contained over 300 times the toxic level.  “This level is way above anything we were expecting – it’s taken us completely by surprise.”  In King George’s time, his bizarre behaviour and wild outbursts were treated as insanity.   He was bound in a straitjacket and chained to a chair to control his ravings.

Poisoning a Nation:

Sodium fluoride has been shown to cause a dose-dependent decrease in the amount of  DNA replication in cultured WI-38 (human) cells  (Skare et al.,1986b). Fluoride ion is known to inhibit many enzymes, and any effects of fluoride on DNA or chromosomes are more likely the result of fluoride inhibition of DNA repair or replication enzymes than of interaction of fluoride with DNA itself (Cole et al., 1986; Skare et al., 1986b). 

In 1786 or shortly thereafter, The Bavarian Government printed all of the papers that were discovered into a publication entitled: “Original Writing of the Order of the Illuminati” and forwarded it to every government in Europe. It appeared that the schemes were too outrageous to be taken seriously at the time. In reality, the Illuminati had already infiltrated the very governments who received the Bavarian Report.

Weishaupt took refuge with one of his royal adepts, the Duke of Saxe-Gotha.  Zwack went to England.

It was the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family (the current British royals) that had sponsored the rise of Adam Weishaupt, or else he was actually a member of that family.   Weishaupt was born and raised in the Bavarian town of Gotha.  It was mainly through the Duke of Saxe-Gotha success in infiltrating the British throne, that the Illuminati were able to infiltrate and eventually eliminate Catholic Nobility.

These important Catholic families are not included in modern history books because they have always been enemies of the Illuminati.  Their names are changed in genealogies, misspelled, ignored or slandered in school history books and even on social media today.

In a letter of Quintin Crawford to Lord Auckland on May 23, 1793, quoted on page 50:

“Hitherto, the basis of human polity was religion, the Supreme Being was everywhere adored, and the great maxims of morality respected; but when the order of civil society had attained a degree of perfection unknown in former ages, we see endeavors almost everywhere put into practice to destroy it.  Atheism rising against religion, anarchy against government, vagabonds against the industrious, men who have nothing to lose against those who enjoy what they received from their ancestors or acquired by their labor, and this conflict brought at last into the field to be decided by the sword.”

Page 92,93:

“Weishaupt’s main themes were to demolish all kings and nobles, all Republics, all laws, all civil codes, all fear of retribution for evil deeds and to substitute for this the ‘religion of reason’.  For this to occur, both family and national life must cease to exist, along with all Catholics.

Weishaupt, in a direction given to the Heirophants of the Illuminati writes:

‘At the moment when men united themselves into nations they ceased to recognize themselves under a common name. Nationalism or National Love took the place of universal love.  With the division of the globe and its countries benevolence restricted itself behind boundaries that it was never again to transgress.  Then it became a virtue to spread out at the expense of those who did not happen to be under our dominion.

Then, in order to attain this goal, it became permissible to despise foreigners, and to deceive and to offend them.  This virtue was called Patriotism.  That man was called a Patriot, who, whilst just towards his own people, was unjust to others, who blinded himself to the merits of foreigners and took for perfections the vices of this own country.  So one sees that Patriotism gave birth to Localism, to the family spirit, and finally to Egoism. Thus the origin of states or governments of civil society was the seed of discord and Patriotism found its punishment in itself…Diminish, do away with this love of country, and men will once more learn to know and love each other as men, there will be no more partiality, the ties between hearts will unroll and extend’. (Nachtrag…Originalschriften) des Illuminaten Ordens), Zweite Abtheilung, p. 65)

“In these words”, writes Webster, “are the purest expression of Internationalism as it is expounded today.  Rousseau had merely paved the way for revolution; Weishaupt constructed the actual machinery of revolution itself.”

To understand how absurd ‘National Patriotism’ is, study any pre-1800 map to see how recent and arbitrary national boundaries are, how contrary they are to true cultural identity.

The documents revealed that: “Women also were to be enlisted as Illuminati by being given hints of emancipation.  “to win them over should be one of our cleverest studies.  More or less they can all be led towards change by vanity, curiosity, sensuality, and inclination.  From this can one draw much profit for the good cause.  This sex has a large part of the world in its hands.” (Neuesten Arbeitung des Spartacus und Philo, vi. 139.)

Further revelations included:  “The female adepts were then to be divided into two classes, each with its own secret, the first to consist of virtuous women who would give an air of respectability to the Order, the second of “light women”, who would help to satisfy those brothers who have a penchant for pleasure”. But the present utility of both classes would consist in providing funds for the society.  Fools with money, whether men or women, were to be particularly welcomed…”but let us beware of telling them our secrets, this sort of people must always be made to believe that the grade they have reached is the last.” (Barruel, Memoires sur le Jacobinisme, iii. 28, quoting Originalschriften.)

Webster quoting the words of Prudhomme:

“The French Revolution did a great deal of good to the Jews; it entirely proscribed that antiquated prejudice which caused the remains of this ancient people to be regarded as a race of degraded men below all others…what did they do to show their gratitude?  What they did before; they have not changed, they have not mended their ways, they contributed not a little to the fall of assignats  [fiat money]. The disorder of our finances was a Peruvian mine for them; they have not abated their infamous traffic; on the contrary, civil liberty has only availed them to extend their stock-jobbing speculations.  Public misery became a rich patrimony to them…The Government had need of them, and God knows how dearly they have made the Republic pay the resources that it demanded of them.  What mysteries of iniquity would be revealed if the Jews, like moles, did not make a point of working in the dark!  In a word, and to say all, the Jews have never been more Jews than since we tried to make of them men and citizens.”

(Crimes de la Revolution, iii. 44…footnote of Webster:  Burke relates that the Jews made large profits out of the plunder of the Churches, and that he is told “the very sons of such Jew-jobbers have been made bishops, persons not to be suspected of any Christian superstition” (Reflections on the French Revolution, p. 254). This may explain the apostacy of certain prelates on the 8th of November 1793.

Karl Marx was never anything but a double agent for the wealthy.  Still duped today, the most sincere seekers of truth study him earnestly.  In the well-known letter that the famous new Messianer Baruch Levy sent to Karl Marx, which was discovered in the year 1888 and published for the first time in the same year. The text is as follows:

 “The Jewish people as a whole is its own Messiah. Its kingdom over the universe is obtained through the uniting of the other human races, through the suppression of frontiers and of monarchies, which are bulwarks for particularism and hinder the erection of a world republic where citizenship is everywhere recognized to the Jew. In this new organization of mankind, the sons of Israel, who at present are scattered over the entire earth surface, will all be of the same race and of the same traditional culture, without, however, forming another nationality, and will be without contradiction the leading element in all parts, particularly if it is successful in laying upon the masses of workers a permanent leadership by some Jews. The governments of peoples all pass with the formation of the universal republic effortlessly into the hands of the Israelites in favour of the victory of the proletariat. Then the personal property of the rulers will be able to be suppressed by the rulers of the Jewish race who will everywhere govern over the property of the Peoples. Then the promise of the Talmud will be fulfilled, that when the time of the Messiah has come, the Jews will have the goods of all peoples of the world in their possession.”

…After the French defeat of 1870 and the fall of the Emperor Napoleon III, the Marxists, led by Karl Marx from London, formed the Commune from the 18th March 1871 onwards. During this period of more than two months, in Paris the National Guard, which had been transformed into an armed organization, was through and through dependent on the Marxist International.

Setting the pattern for recent events in Kiev, Ukraine we find that when the Revolutionists could not resist the attack of the troops of the government, and when they saw their defeat as unavoidable, they devoted themselves to robbery, murder and incendiarism.  This was the Samson Option, in accordance with the plan repeated by Clauserets in the year 1869:

 “Ourselves or nothing! I promise you, Paris will belong to us or cease to exist.”

Upon this occasion was clearly revealed the joint guilt of the French Jewish bankers together with the Communists, when it is established how Salluste in his book “Les origines sécrètes du bolchevisme”  [Secret Origins of Bolshevism] alludes to the fact that Rothschild played both sides of the war.  He exercised pressure on one side in Versailles with Thiers, the President of the republic, in order to prevent a decisive fight against the Marxist Communists, and on the other side enjoyed a total protection of his person and property in the city of Paris by his control of the National Guard [the Federals], while the rest of Paris was thrown into a horrible and bloody chaos.

In this respect Salluste tells us in his afore-mentioned work, page 137:

“It is certain that M. Rothschild had good reasons to hold a conciliation possible: his villa in the Rue Saint-Florentin was protected day and night by a guard troop of the Federals (Marxists), who had the task of preventing any plundering. This protective troop was maintained for two months, up to the moment when the great barricade, which was only a few paces away, was taken by the Versailles troops.

 “While hostages were shot, the most beautiful palaces of Paris went up in flames and thousands of Frenchmen died as victims of the civil war, it is worth mentioning that the protection granted by the Communists to the great Jewish banker did not cease for a moment.”

But once the Nobility were all either murdered or in exile the result:

            “But it was the peasants who became the chief sufferers from the domination of the Jews.  Under the old Regime, the feudal dues had proved oppressive, but in many instances the seigneurs were the benefactors and protectors of their vassals.  The Jewish usurer on whom the peasant proprietors now depended to carry on if crops failed or weather proved unpropitious, showed no indulgence.”

“As soon as he” (referring to the peasant in Russia), writes Daniel Stern in describing his own Jewish race’s effect on a Christian society that practices usury“has entered into commercial relations with this ruse [Khazarian] race, as soon as he has put his name at the foot of a paper which he has read and re-read without perceiving the hidden clause that does for him, the peasant, in spite of all his finesse, will never succeed in recovering his liberty.  Henceforth his activity, his intelligence, the benefits of Providence who sends him rich harvests will profit him nothing, but only his new master.  The exorbitant interest on a very small capital will absorb his time, and his labours.  Every day he will see the comfort of his family diminish and his difficulties increase.  As the fatal day approaches when the debt falls due the somber face of his creditor warns him that he can expect no respite.  He must make up his mind, he must go further along the road of perdition, borrow again, always borrow until ruin has been brought about, and fields, meadows, and woods, house, flocks and home all have passed from his industrious hands into the rapacious ones of the usurer”  From La Revolution de 1848, by Daniel Stern, ii. 89 (La Comtess d’Agoult)

“Here is the true history of the disinherited, not in France alone, but in Russia, in Austria, in Poland; everywhere that the worker lives by tilling his own soil, the abolition of feudalism has led to the domination of the money-lender, and the money-lender is in most cases a Jew.”

The account given on his journey through White Russia in 1816 by the Grand Duke Nicholas, who, remarks:

“The general ruination of the peasantry of these provinces is attributable to the [Khazarian] Jews, who are second in import to the landowners only;  by their industries they exploit to the utmost the unfortunate population.  They are everything here—merchants, contractors, pothouse-keepers, millers, carriers, artisans, etc., and they are so clever in squeezing and cheating the common people that they advance money on the unsown bread and discount the harvest before the fields are sown.  They are regular leeches who suck up everything and completely exhaust this province.”  (E.A. Brayley Hodgett’s The Court of Russia in the Nineteenth Century, i. 161).

“If, exasperated by this tyranny, the peasants from time to time have given way to violence and turned on their oppressors, is it altogether surprising?…”

“The industrial worker as well as the peasant found the Jew an exacting taskmaster.  It was not only the introduction of machinery that at the beginning of the ninetieth century brought about the speeding up of industry, but the spirit of the new commercialism, which succeeded to the leisurely methods of the Old Regime…

This driving force behind the worker, this spirit of cut-throat competition, was largely attributable to the Jew.”

“In order to appreciate thoroughly the insincerity of Marx with regard to this question, it is only necessary to glance through his book Das Capital and then the work of Werner Sombart on The Jews and Modern Capitolism.”

“The Jew,” as Sombart remarks, “embodied modern Capitalism”, and he goes on to describe, step by step, the building up by Jewish hands of the system which superseded the Old Regime of amicable trading and peaceful industry; he shows the Jew as inventor of advertisement, as the employer of cheap labor, as the principal participant in the stock-jobbing or agiotage that prevailed at the end of the first French Revolution.  But it is above all as the usurer that the Jew achieved power.  “Modern capitalism”, says Sombart, “is the child of money-lending.”

Karl Marx, was an infiltrator agent working for the wealthy capitalist and industrialist Frederich Engles:

“…On what did Marx live?  On the bounty of Frederich Engels, described by the Socialist Guillaume, Secretary of the Internationale, as ‘a rich manufacturer accustomed to regard workmen as machine fodder and cannon fodder.’   (Guillaume, Documents de l’Internatonal, iii. 153)

“His large fortune had been made out of Lancashire cotton spinning, and it was he who supplemented the meager earnings of his collaborator.” (Reminiscences, by H.M. Hyndman, pp. 278, 279)

Webster wrote more and keep in mind this is almost 100 years ago:

“The great fortune of the Rothschilds was built upon the basis of stealing money and then loaning it until they became the principle loan floaters of the world, and then the first railway kings. The period of 1820 onwards became, as Sombart calls it, the age of the Rothschilds, so that by the middle of the century it was a common dictum, “There is only one power in Europe, and that is Rothschild.”

 “How is it that Marx never mentions this in this writings?  Simply because he was promoting their interests by fomenting revolution.  For the true fact of the matter is that they achieved their wealth not so much by being the best business people, the Medici were best at that, but by being the best assassins of their competition, and what better way to assassinate competitors and steal their goods than by hiding under the cover of a revolution?

There have been many non-jewish leaders who would have done away with the Rothschilds, if they had survived.  But centuries upon centuries of poisonings and other forms of violence have assured that the Rothschilds could proceed with their plans of world dominance and genocide of the Christian nobility.

This has left the productive and honest people of the world with no protection on earth, other than the mercy of God.  But since our scriptures prohibit usury, both paid and received, we cannot expect God’s mercy if we do not follow the commandments. As we add more sins even worse than these, we are truly left to our own devices.  Neither a borrower nor a lender be.”

When the Nobility went underground there was no way to continue the feudal system and so the need to borrow money at interest became unavoidable.  The feudal system was based on grants of free land, equipment, basic farm animals and supplies, in exchange for improvements upon that land which would then lead to taxable sales of surplus.  Before joining a feudal society, one must take an oath to uphold the belief system and religion of the community. This is a completely voluntary system that is best kept within the extended family. The present government would never allow these facts to be taught in schools.  It’s just too good a plan, and too easy to implement, once we get our land back from the NWO squatters.

Page 96, Webster says:  “There is no hope for suffering humanity but to repudiate the Revolution and all its works, and to strike out a fresh pate with new hopes, new aims founded not on the dreams of visionaries or the schemes of demagogues but on the true desires of the people”.

That true desire is simply to have the freedom to work at what we love doing and to enjoy the results of that work without having it stolen by those who refuse to work.

The trickiest of methods are used to instigate a revolution.

Cagliostro, for example, engineered the slander against Queen Marie Antoinette that led to her death, through the ‘Affair of the Necklace’.  The scam is described in detail in Memoirs of Barras, where he explains how Cagliostro hired a look-alike actress to pretend that she was Marie Antoinette in order to pull off the scam while the Queen was oblivious to the whole thing. Advertising was used to spread the lies. There are many other instances of using look-alike actors and media lies to foment violence and create factions.

“It is therefore no fantastic theory but the literal truth to say that the present world crisis is a conflict between the powers of good and evil.  Christianity is a beleaguered citadel surrounded by the dark forces which have mustered for the supreme onslaught.  Only in one way can it be withstood.  The words of Joseph de Maistre, who, like Barruel, regarded the French Revolution merely as the first stage in the campaign, must be taken as the battle-cry of the White Army today: ‘The French Revolution is Satanic in its principle and can be only really killed, exterminated, and finished by the contrary principle.’  The Christian principle—that is the force that must be opposed to the Satanic power of the World Revolution…

If the people of our country will but realize the diabolical nature of the conspiracy at work amongst them, the powers of Hell cannot prevail against us.  In ignorance and indifference lies our principal danger.  Every outbreak of the World Revolution that has so far occurred has been rendered possible by the apathy of the nation in general.

Let the words of Barruel, uttered in the face of the same peril a hundred and twenty five years ago, ring in our ears today:

 ‘Cease to flatter yourselves.  The danger is certain, it is continual, it is terrible, it threatens you all without exception.  Keep yourselves, however, from giving way to that kind of terror which is only cowardice and discouragement; for, with all the certainty of the danger, I say to you none the less:  Will to be saved and you will be saved…One cannot triumph over a nation that resolves to defend itself.  Know how to will as they do and you will have nothing more to fear from them’…”

Pg. 318:

“The way in which the necessary literature is forced on the attention of the public is described in the passage already quoted in the parallels to the “Protocols” :

 “We must take care our writers be well puffed and that the reviewers do not depreciate them.  Therefore we must endeavor by every means to gain over the reviewers and journalists; and we must also try to gain the booksellers, who in time will see that it is their interest to side with us.”

“Other methods to obtain adherents is exploitation of grievances, promise of power; “The pupils are convinced that the Order will rule the world.  Every member therefore becomes a ruler…by this lure the Order will spread.”

“Internationalism, the policy of national suicide advocated by the modern revolutionaries, has been frequently attributed to the Jews, and it is obvious that a race without a country might find the ideas of Internationalism attractive.”

Wickham Steed quotes a letter written in 1905:

 “There is a Jewish question and this terrible race means not only to master one of the grandest warrior nations in the world [Germany], but it means and is consciously striving, to enter the lists against the other great race of the north (the Russians), the only one that has hitherto stood between it and its goal of world-power.  Am I wrong?  Tell me.  For already England and France are, if not actually dominated by Jews, very nearly so, while the United States, by the hands of those whose grip they are ignorant of, are slowly but surely yielding to that international and insidious hegemony.  Remember that I am half a Jew by blood, but that in all I have power to be I am not.  (The Hapsburg Monarchy (1913) p. 169.

“In Austria-Hungary”,  the author observes on page 155,  “the spread of Socialism has been largely the result of Jewish propaganda.  Dr. Victor Adler, the founder and leader of the Austrian party, is a Jew, as are many of his followers.  In Hungary the party was also founded and inspired by the Jews.”

On page 237:

“The war on the bourgeoisie waged by Marat, Robespierre, Clootz, and Hebert under the influence of the Illuminati is again declared by Freiheit for Dec. 18, 1880: “It is no longer aristocracy and royalty that the people intend to destroy.  Here perhaps but a coup de grace or two are yet needed.

No, but in the coming onslaught the object is to smite the entire middle class with annihilation.

Or again:  “Extirpate all the contemptible brood! Such is the refrain of the revolutionary song…Science now puts means into our hands which make it possible to arrange for the wholesale destruction of the brutes in a perfectly quiet and business-like fashion,” etc. (Zencher, Anarchism, p. 231)

After the French Revolution left everyone working 12 hour days on starvation wages, the good working people tried to organize for change, but Marx, secret agent for the industrialists, infiltrated to undermine their efforts by introducing violence:

“The revolutionaries of all countries are uniting into an “international Social Revolutionary Working Men’s Association” for the purpose of a social revolution.  The Headquarters of the Association is at London, and sub-committees are formed in Paris, Geneva, and New York…it is their duty to collect money for the purchase of poison and arms, as well as to discover places suitable for the construction of mines [bombs], etc.  To attain the proposed end, the annihilation of all rulers, ministers of State, nobility, the clergy…any means are permissible, and therefore great attention should be given specially to the study of chemistry and the preparation of explosives, as being the most important weapons, etc.”

(Zacher, Die Rothe Internationale, p. 27)

On page 191 is an excerpt from a letter to Gouginot Des Mousseaux received from a Protestant statesman:

“Since the revolutionary recrudescence of 1845, I have had relations with a Jew who, from vanity, betrayed the secret of the secret societies with which he had been associated, and who warned me eight or ten days beforehand of all the revolutions which were about to break out at any point in Europe.  I owe to him the unshakeable conviction that all these movement of “oppressed people”’ etc, etc, are devised by half a dozen individuals, who give their orders to the secret societies all over Europe.  The ground is absolutely mined beneath our feet, and the Jews provide a large contingent of these miners.  The Jewish bankers will soon be, through their prodigious fortunes, our lords and masters.  All the great Radical newspapers of Germany are in the hands of Jews…

The ruse of the conspiracy is to use words with a double meaning, and not only this, but with meanings diametrically opposed to each other. Thus freedom means slavery, equality of the sexes means degradation of women, democracy means dictatorship, communism means the seizure of all private property for the Jewish elite.”

Confiscation of property is an essential element of ‘engineered’ revolution:

“The following is a quote from a [an official] Cheka announcement in the Kuban region: “Cossack villages and settlements, which give shelter to Whites and Greens [Ukrainian nationalists], will be destroyed, the entire adult population — executed, and all property — confiscated.” (Solzenitzen at

How does a revolution play out? Victor Hugo’s Les Miserables, unabridged version describes what came of it in France.  Here is the short version:

Pg. 65:   “Food, owing to four years of war and seven of revolution was at famine princes, the destruction of commerce…had raised all the commodities of life to the same prohibitive level and created vast unemployment. Meanwhile the newly rich, the war profiteers, the army contractors, the adventurer who had made their fortunes out of the Revolution, reveled in luxury, their wives and mistresses swathed in pearls and diamonds, and little else besides, flaunted their charms and opulence before the hungry eyes of the poor.”

In the book “Strange True Tales of Louisiana” by George Washington Cable, Alix de Morainville wrote of her escape from France.  Her mother, for fear of arrest could not withdraw the jewelry and savings that were deposited in the Bank of France before she fled.  This was right after both Alix’s father and husband had been among the very first victims of the guillotine.

“For every aristocrat thus victimized, the Bank of France confiscated the private wealth of the nation.  In Russia, while Marx was promoting Communism, his employer Engles was investing confiscated wealth in the New York Stock Exchange.”

In France “A secret Directorate had been set up to butcher the actual Directorate along with anyone who tried to resist.  They had on their side 4500 soldiers and 6000 police who had been promised ‘booty’, that is, they could keep what ever they stole during the chaos.  All supplies to the capitol were to be seized, the wealthier people were to be driven from their homes which would then be given to ‘the poor’.  All was then to belong to Babeauf and his cabal.  It is thanks to a man named Grisel, who had unintentionally been drawn into this, and feared to make himself known as an enemy to the conspiracists, who discovered the plan and informed the Directorate and averted the massacre.”

Paul Barras, member of the Directory, describes in interesting detail how he averted this coup in his ‘Memoirs of Barras’.  He writes,

“The conspiracy intended to destroy industry in order to own it after the smoke cleared.  Already the destruction of the aristocracy had thrown numberless workers on the streets so that by 1791 nearly all the hands that had provided hairdressing, gilders, bookbinders, tailors, embroiderers, and servants wandered about Paris and collected in crowds.  The unemployment of these people led to the unemployment of others.  Church holidays were abolished so that about 40 more workdays were added to those who still had work.”

Revolution as Population Reduction

A correspondence discovered stated:

“Monsieur de la Metherie assured me that during the time of the Revolutionary Tribunals, it was a serious contemplation to reduce the population of France to 14,000,000.  Dubois Crance was a very distinguished and enthusiastic partisan of this human and philosophical policy  (France in 1802, Letters of Redhead Yorke, edited by JAC Sykes (Heinemann,) 1906, pp. 102, 127  The actual goal was to bring the population down to 8 million, from 25 million at that time, or as it was said, to 1/3 of the present at that day.”

False news as a means of agitating war:

 “The most remarkable instance of engineered agitation during the early stages of the Revolution was the extraordinary incident known to history as “the Great Fear”, when on the same day, July 22, 1789, and almost at the same hour, in towns and villages all over France, a panic was created by the announcement that brigands were approaching and therefore all good citizens must take up arms.  The messengers who brought the news poste haste on horseback in many cases exhibited placards headed “Edict of the King” bearing the words, “The King orders all chateaux to be burnt down, he only wishes to keep his own!”.  And the people obedient to these commands, seized upon every weapon they could find and set themselves to the task of destruction.”

Pg 126:  Marquise de Custine who traveled Russia after the Dakabrist uprising wrote:

 “Well informed people have attributed this riot to the influence of the Secret Societies by which Russia is worked…The method that the conspirators had employed to rouse the army was a ridiculous lie; the rumor had been spread that Nicholas was usurping the throne form his brother Constantine, who, they said was advancing on Petersburg to defend his rights by armed force.  This is the means they took in order to decide the revolutionaries to cry under the windows of the Palace: “Long live the Constitution!”  The leaders had persuaded them that this word Constitution was the name of the wife of Constantine, their supposed Empress.  You see that an idea of duty was at the bottom of the soldiers’ hearts, since they could only be led into rebellion by a trick.”

Pg 131 is quoted another intercepted letter written by secret agent:

 “…the fall of thrones is no longer a matter of doubt to me now that I have just studied the work of our societies in France, in Switzerland, in Germany and as far as Russia…In order to kill the old world surely, we have held that we must stifle the Catholic and Christian germ…”

Webster concludes that: “The corruption and arrogance of government officials is an absolute necessity for these destructive policies to work.  In vain de Tocqueville warned the Chamber of Deputies wither this state of public affairs would lead them.  He wrote in 1846:  “Let us seek in history the efficacious causes that have taken away power from the governing classes; they lost it when they became by their egoism unworthy to retain it…The evils I point out will bring about the gravest revolutions.”

“Corrupt and selfish politicians will always be the most useful allies of Anarchists.”

In the year 1916, the Lieutenant-General of the Imperial Russian Army, A. Nechvolodof, described secret information which had been received from one of his agents, which on the 15th February of the same year reached the supreme command of the Russian General Staff and read as follows:

“The first secret assembly, which reveals the beginning of the acts of violence, took place on Monday, the 14th February, in the East Side of New York. Of the 62 representatives gathered, 50 were veterans of the revolution of 1905, and the others new members. The greater part of those present were Jews and among them many educated people, as for example, doctors, writers, etc… Some professional revolutionaries were also found amongst them…

 “The first hours of this assembly were almost exclusively devoted to testing the methods and the possibilities of carrying out a great revolution in Russia. It was one of the most favourable moments for this.

“It was stated that the party had just received information from Russia, according to which the situation was completely and absolutely favourable; for all previously agreed conditions for a favourable rising were present. The one serious hindrance was the question of money; but scarcely was this remark made, when several members at once answered that this circumstance should cause no reflection, for, at the moment when it was necessary, substantial sums would be given by persons who sympathised with the movement for freedom. In this connection the name of Jakob Schiff was repeatedly mentioned.”     (

Woodrow Wilson, 28th U.S. PRESIDENT 1913-21  In reference to passing of the Federal Reserve Act said:  “A great industrial Nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the Nation and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the world-no longer a Government of free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men.”

“I have been deceived.”

“I have betrayed my country.”

Ezra Pound and Denial of Media Access

After he was denied broadcasting time in the U.S., Dr. Ezra Pound broadcast from Italy in an effort to persuade people of the United States not to enter World War II.   Franklin D. Roosevelt personally ordered Pound’s indictment, which was demanded by his three personal assistants, Harry Dexter White, Lauchlin Currie, and Alger Hiss, all of whom were subsequently identified as being connected with Communist/Jewish espionage.  It was Dr. Pound, while imprisoned in a Federal mental institute, who paid Eustace Mullins to do the first research on the origins and true nature of the Federal Reserve.

The resulting book  could not be published in the United States due to the powers that be so Mullins went abroad to have it published.  The burning of the entire edition of 10,000 books in Germany was upheld April 21, 1961 by Judge Israel Katz of the Bavarian Supreme Court

When Tsar Nicholas of Russia refused to heed warnings, and instead naively continued to give protection to undermining forces, he is described in this way by Mikhail Rodzianko, Russian, 1959-1944 when the Tsar is told:  “There is not one honest man in your entourage; all decent people have left”  …The Tzar is said to have pressed his head with his hands and said “Is it possible that for twenty two years I have tried to do some good, and that for twenty two years I have failed?…Yes Your Majesty, for twenty two years you have followed the wrong trail”.

Karl Marx and other traitorous secret agents today are deemed to be important historical figures whose plagiarized ideas are a basic requirement for a University degree.

Weishaupt, in a direction given to the Heirophants of the Illuminati writes that by replacing Feudalism with Nationalism, it becomes permissible to despise foreigners, and to deceive and to offend them.  This virtue is called Patriotism.  Practicing justice towards your own people, while unjust to others, blinded to the merits of foreigners, Patriotism is an element of centralized states or governments, something that did not exist in its present form during Feudal times.   “In these words”, writes Webster, “are the purest expression of Internationalism as it is expounded today.  Rousseau had merely paved the way for revolution; Weishaupt constructed the actual machinery of revolution itself.”   Patriotism is nothing more than  the Talmudic doctrine of tribal supremacy and moral relativism, the exact opposite of the Christian doctrine.

The Rothschilds fueled the power of the Nouveau Aristocracy through control of the fiat money supply and the raw power of a mercenary army, whose only allegiance is to the entity that signs the paycheck.  The Catholic Nobility, on the other hand, relied on a voluntary army whose allegiance was to the survival of the community.  The feudal system was based onvoluntary family relationships according to a 1750 French dictionary.  This is proven in the census and genealogical data. You will be told all sorts of nonsense about the evils of Feudalism, when the facts point out that the Dark Ages consisted of 1500 years of some of the greatest achievements of mankind. If we knew this, we wouldn’t tolerate the menace that we are under.

The reason we are lied to about the “Dark Ages” and the Feudal system is precisely because it was so successful.  We now live in a minority controlled system that sucks the life out of successful societies as a matter of strategy.  The Religion of Protest consciously creates the Failed State. Then Disaster Capitalists profit by crisis prices and the end result is impoverishment for many and maybe even total annihilation of all Christian life on the planet.

The success of the Feudal system rested on the voluntary adhesion to a single religion. The Nobility encouraged and taught people to act in a Christian manner.  It was this Nobility that the Illuminati sought to destroy, as part of the effort to destroy Christianity.  When the Russian ruling family began making concessions to integrate the Jews into Christian society, the results were a genocide of 60 million Christians.   Were these deaths all at the hands of a small minority of Jewish relatives of the Tzaarina?  Alexander Solzhetzyn has written much on his experiences in the Soviet Gulags. The art of Bolshevik take-over is easy to understand when one knows that Bolshevik is the Russian word for minority.   The immediate result of  welcoming this minority of highly secretive Talmudic Khazarians into a Christian society is described here:

“See the account given on his journey through White Russia in 1816 by the Grand Duke Nicholas, who, remarks: 

“The general ruination of the peasantry of these provinces is attributable to the Jews… [Khazarian money-lenders who call themselves Jewish], who are second in import to the landowners only;  by their industries they exploit to the utmost the unfortunate population.  They are everything here—merchants, contractors, pothouse-keepers, millers, carriers, artisans, etc., and they are so clever in squeezing and cheating the common people that they advance money on the unsown bread and discount the harvest before the fields are sown…

They are regular leeches who suck up everything and completely exhaust this province.” 

(E.A. Brayley Hodgett’s The Court of Russia in the Nineteenth Century, i. 161).       


The excerpts quoted in this article are mostly from a rare book in a private collection.  Written by Mrs. Nesta Webster, in 1921, “World Revolutions: The Plot Against Civilization”, Owens Publishing, Texas; this author is widely respected for her impeccable research.  The book references police records of Bavaria, including confiscated personal letters from the past 200-300 years. The reason it is rare is because so many copies have been destroyed, due to the incriminating evidence in it.


One thought on “Religion of Protest

  1. “For all denunciation implies a moral doctrine of some kind; and the modern revolutionist doubts not only the institution he denounces, but the doctrine by which he denounces it…As a politician, he will cry out that war is a waste of life, and then, as a philosopher, that all life is a waste of time.

    “A Russian pessimist will denounce a policeman for killing a peasant, and then prove by the highest philosophical principles that the peasant ought to have killed himself. A man denounces marriage as a lie, and then denounces aristocratic profligates for treating it as a lie. He calls a flag a bauble, and then blames the oppressors of Poland or Ireland because they take away that bauble.

    “The man of this school goes first to a political meeting, where he complains that savages are treated as if they were beasts; then he takes his hat and umbrella and goes to a scientific meeting, where he proves that they practically are beasts. In short, the modern revolutionist, being an infinite skeptic, is always engaged in undermining his own mines.

    “In his book on politics he attacks men for trampling on morality; in his book on ethics he attacks morality for trampling on men. Therefore the modern man in revolt has become practically useless for all purposes of revolt. By rebelling against everything, he has lost his right to rebel against anything.”[14]

    This quote is from:
    [14] G. K. Chesterton, Orthodoxy (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1996), 52-53…. This just found in an article about the BDS movement, a peaceful way to fight a mighty world power by refusing to purchase their products.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.