This update contains information about Obama’s actual religion, now that he openly supports “Gay Rights” over Christian Rights, which in the case of homosexuality just happens to agree somewhat with Muslim teaching. Unlike the Muslims, no Christian legally advocates punishment or death for gays. What Christians do is, in a loving way, invite them to voluntarily join their church. That’s a big difference, and homosexuals may one day rue the day they persecuted Christians, if the Muslims gain power. Obama’s alliance with bankrupt Saudi Arabia, the very sponsor of radical Islam and it’s Anti-American propaganda, may represent an end of funding for Farrakhan. What will happen to the Muslim training camps all over the United Sates is an open question. Eyes wide open on this subject, and on incoming Jihadis camouflaged as “victims, and refugees”, a ruse which would only fool the hopelessly blind. America has absolutely no obligation to accept enemies of Christianity, and if it does, their plans are to kill us.
There are many examples in scripture of God’s use of the ungodly to rid the world of sin. Isaias 54 is a wonderful poem which comforts the “Servants of God”, reminding us that: “Behold, I have created the smith that bloweth the coals in the fire, and bringeth forth a vessel for his work, and I created the killer to destroy(16).” Isaias goes on the tell us that those who create that fire will ultimately themselves be burned, but that his servants will receive their inheritance. This is the message given to those who have truly maintained service to God in all its aspects, the true “Israel” which means literally “Isa is God”. Isa is the Arabic version of Jesus.
One can see plainly that Obama approves and supports Islam, therefore he is thought to be a Muslim and he did have an open alliance with the Nation of Islam. However, his approval of homosexuality caused a rift between he and Farrakhan. The confusion between male and female is part of the religion popular in Indonesia and India that worships the Monkey God Hanuman.
I’m not expert on the subject, the link provided can start others on their own research. What I do know directly from an Indian Hindu friend of mine, is that Hanuman charms must be worn for his power to be effective, and the belief in this monkey god is firm even among educated people. They do claim Obama as their own and credit Hanuman for that seemingly impossible accomplishment of him becoming president of the corporate United States of America. There are photos of young Barry Sotero wearing a Hanuman necklace.
In his own book, Obama says that he ‘re-positioned’ himself as an American and a Christian when he decided to enter politics. A little bit of research will uncover that he doesn’t do a good job of pretending to be Christian. I’ve seen him in speeches laugh about it and even make an obscene gesture when speaking as if he were a Christian Protestant Preacher.
For about 1500 years the armies of the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Christian Churches fought off Muslims. European Christians were horrified at the thought of Muslim conquest. There must have been a good reason for their dread of the ‘Turks’, the ‘Sarracens’, the ‘Mohamadens’, all old words used to describe what they knew to be a barbaric race of people who made a sewer and a blood bath of any place they entered.
Being ignorant of the details of Islam, we must heed the warnings of distinguished thinkers who have studied the religion in detail. For further proof, we can heed the warnings of the Hindu people who experienced the massacres of all males, and the enslavement of all girls after an invasion of Muslims into India as late as the mid-1900’s. The progeny of these enslaved girls were of course trained in Islam and this is what makes up an unknown percentage of the military-age Jihadis, falsely claiming to be ‘refugees’, coming our way and already in our neighborhoods and government.
Members of Obama’s own staff are on record that Obama funds ISIS, and now it has come out that he wants to fund Al Qaeda, as if he hadn’t been doing that all along. A school child could figure out that the so-called “refugees” are soldiers of conquest, no matter what name or religion they call themselves. Where would so many military-age men get so much money to pay their expensive passages into Europe, how else could they act in such mass unison? What else is the explanation for the fact that many of them come from places in Africa and the Middle East where the economy is booming?
If you subscribe to the Liberal Religion of Humanism and Relativity of Truth, some call it Judaism, you might be wondering what would be the problem if Anti-Christians enter Europe. In fact, it furthers your own agenda in ridding the world of rival religions. You are thinking that diversity is good. But diversity is good only in furthering your own agenda, no one elses. You would also accuse me of ‘racism’, which is a sin only in your religion, not in mine. Why would a white person consider pro-white behavior sinful? Who would be that stupid deserves to be annihilated by those who wish to annihilate whites. My racism is non-violent expression of who I am and not wanting to change that about myself. There exists a hatred based on race that is of the genocidal kind, as America could soon see.
Listen to what John Quincy Adams had to say about Islam and it’s requirement to wage “exterminating war’ against non-Muslims. The term I now hear used by the Nation of Islam is ‘Eradication’ of you and I, folks…and our progeny. They won’t stop until we are all dead, and the girls taken into slavery. Their strategy is to simply be here on welfare and have babies, to drain us for a while. This would explain the proliferation of vulgar trolls on the internet blog spaces. When they feel secure they will spring on us like fire ants, I hear. Why? Because this is their religion. It enslaves them as much as they enslave others. They will obviously make their move before the end of Obama’s term. Many warnings about Islam exist for us. It is forbidden to Catholics, and the Pope doesn’t have the right to change that, no matter his opinion on it.
over 400 million Hindus got slaughtered during the Muslim invasion and occupation of India. Survivors got enslaved and castrated. India’s population is said to have been around 600 million at the time of Muslim invasion. By the mid 1500’s the Hindu population was 200 million.
By the time the British arrived to the shores of India and after centuries of Islamic law ruling India, the Hindu population was not behaving like their normal self; they were behaving like Muslims. There are many witness reports from the British archives of horrendous Hindu incidents that were shocking in cruelty to the British – and they therefore sometimes referred to the people as “savages”. Yes, anyone who gets contaminated by the association with Islamic ‘culture’ truly gets tainted and savaged. That is exactly why it is so detrimental and dangerous.
In the United Arab Emirates, Indians represent the single largest expatriate community with 2.6 million, accounting for 30 per cent of the total population, according to the Indian Embassy in Abu Dhabi. The UAE relies heavily on foreign workers, who make up 85 per cent on the country’s population. The majority of foreigners living in the country are from South Asian nations — India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The UAE population has been steadily growing over the past decade. In 2005, it was 4.149 million and in 2010 it was 8.442 million, according to the World Bank The Saudis are vastly outnumbered by these imported workers, and now with welfare cut off, there is no longer any reason for them to stay, and so the Saudis simply pay them to leave. The population of the UAE is “closer to 10 million,” Ameen Al Amiri, Assistant Undersecretary, Public Health Policy and Licence Sector, Ministry of Health, said on Sunday.
The UAE’s population is expected to continue to grow despite rising costs of living due to high rents and the removal of subsidies from petrol prices and utility bills, Alp Eke, senior economist at the National Bank of Abu Dhabi (NBAD), told Gulf News by email.
I’ve copied and pasted a few words of advice from the longer list at Muslim Issues.
He (Muhammad) poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. The essence of his doctrine was violence and lust: to exalt the brutal over the spiritual part of human nature.
– John Quincy Adams
American statesman and the sixth President of the United States from 1825 to 1829. He also served as a diplomat, a Senator and member of the House of Representatives. (July 11, 1767 – February 23, 1848).
The Mohammedan conquest of India was probably the bloodiest story in history.
– Will Durant
American writer, historian, and philosopher (November 5, 1885 – November 7, 1981).
Seen through Hindu eyes, the Muslim invasion of their homeland was an unmitigated disaster.
– Irfan Husain
Pakistani columnist and writer for Dawn.
….eighty million were slaughtered and millions of women were raped…..it was standard practice for Islamic warlords like Ghori and Ghazni to unleash the mass rape and enslavement of hundreds of thousands of women after the slaughter of all males.
An extremely large percentage of Muslims in South Asia today are the progeny of forcible conversions and systematic rape campaigns by marauding Muslim invaders.
– Dr. Younis Shaikh
Pakistani medical doctor, human rights activist and freethinker.
…the number of victims of the persecutions of Hindus by Muslims is easily of the same order of magnitude as that of the [so-called] Nazi extermination policy, though no one has yet made the effort of tabulating the reported massacres and proposing a reasonable estimate of how many millions exactly must have died in the course of the Islamic campaign against Hinduism (such research is taboo). On top of these there is a similar number of abductions and deportations to harems and slave-markets, as well as centuries of political oppression and cultural destruction……
– Koenraad Elst
Belgian orientalist and Indologist.
From the time Muslims started arriving, around 632 AD, the history of India becomes a long, monotonous series of murders, massacres, spoliations, and destructions.
– Alain Danielou
French historian, intellectual, musicologist, Indologist (4 October 1907 – 27 January 1994).
The penalty for apostasy in Islamic law is death. Islam is conceived as a polity, not just as a religious community. It follows therefore that apostasy is treason. It is a withdrawal, a denial of allegiance as well as of religious belief and loyalty. Any sustained and principled opposition to the existing regime or order almost inevitably involves such a withdrawal.
– Bernard Lewis
British-American historian, scholar in Oriental studies, and political commentator.
The contrast between our own faith and Islam is most remarkable. There are in our Scriptures living germs of truth, which accord with civil and religious liberty, and will expand with advancing civilisation. In Islam it is just the reverse. The Koran has no such teaching as with us has abolished polygamy, slavery, and arbitrary divorce, and has elevated woman to her proper place. As a Reformer, Mahomet did advance his people to a certain point, but as a Prophet he left them fixed immovably at that point for all time to come.
– Sir William Muir
Scottish Orientalist, scholar of Islam, and colonial administrator (27 April 1819 – 11 July 1905).
Nor do divine pronouncements on the part of preceding prophets offer him [Muhammad] any witness. On the contrary, he perverts almost all the testimonies of the Old and New Testaments by making them into fabrications of his own, as can be. seen by anyone who examines his law. It was, therefore, a shrewd decision on his part to forbid his followers to read the Old and New Testaments, lest these books convict him of falsity. It is thus clear that those who place any faith in his words believe foolishly.
–St. Thomas Aquinas (Contra Gentiles, Book One, Chapter 6, Paragraph 4)
Italian Dominican friar and Catholic priest and an immensely influential philosopher and theologian in the tradition of scholasticism (1225 – 7 March 1274).
I have devoted most of my time during the last six months to the study of Muslim History and Muslim Law and I am inclined to think that Hindu-Muslim unity is neither possible nor practicable… I do honestly and sincerely believe in the necessity and desirability of Hindi-Muslim unity. I am also fully prepared to trust the Muslim leaders, but what about the injunctions of the Koran and Hadis. The leaders cannot override them.
– Lala Lajpat Rai
Indian Punjabi author and politician who is chiefly remembered as a leader in the Indian fight for independence (28 January 1865 – 17 November 1928).
If we go by the lessons of history we have to accept that the goal of the Hindu-Muslim unity is a mirage. When Muslims first entered India, they looted the country, destroyed the temples, broke the idols, raped the women and heaped innumerable indignities on the people of this country. Today it appears that such noxious behavior has entered the bone marrow of Muslims. Unity can be achieved among equals…. I am of the view that Hindu-Muslim unity, which could not be achieved during the last thousand years, will not materialize during the ensuing thousand years.
– Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay
Bengali novelist and short story writer (15 September 1876 – 16 January 1938).
A very important factor which is making it almost impossible for Hindu-Muslim unity to become an accomplished fact is that the Muslims cannot confine their patriotism to any one country. I had frankly asked many Muslims whether, in the event of any Mohammedan power invading India, they would stand side by side with their Hindu neighbours to defend their common motherland, I was not satisfied with the reply I got from them.
– Rabindranath Tagore
Bengali polymath and Nobel Prize winner in Literature who reshaped Bengali literature and music, as well as Indian art (7 May 1861 – 7 August 1941).
I will close with this final warning by Writer Fernand Braudel, who wrote in “A History of Civilisations” (1995), that Islamic rule in India was a
“colonial experiment” [that] was “extremely violent”, and “the Muslims could not rule the country except by systematic terror. Cruelty was the norm – burnings, summary executions, crucifixions or impalements, inventive tortures. Hindu temples were destroyed to make way for mosques. On occasion there were forced conversions. If ever there were an uprising, it was instantly and savagely repressed: houses were burned, the countryside was laid waste, men were slaughtered and women were taken as slaves.”