So what should we do about having the feeblest minded running the show?   First of all, we could face up to the truth of subversion as a weapon.  In order for an inferior group to maintain their fictional superiority, it becomes necessary to subvert the demonstrably and measurably superior group or individual. 

Superior intellects can pop up in any group, despite the group averages. However, a superior intellect can lie dormant in isolation.  The structure of civilization gives support and guidance.  It allows each generation to build upon the discoveries and accomplishments of our ancestors.  Without this structure, it becomes much easier to
subvert intellectual competition. Therefore, as part of the campaign to reverse the results of IQ and other standardized tests, the entire edifice of Catholic Civilization has ended up in the crosshairs.

What we are given in its place is Relativity of Truth, in direct opposition to Catholic thinking which is basically in line with even more ancient thought.  Plato would be corrected today by a university professor for admitting that such a thing as ‘truth’ exists.  Plato said that “having a grasp at the truth is having a belief that matches the way things are.”

We are now told that truth is something that each of us separately decides for ourselves. Relativity of Truth therefore, is based on raw power. In practice, those who have raw power in terms of their ability to arrest, imprison, deny justice or subjugate in anyway, also have the power to dictate to the public what is true, and what is false. It’s all relative to how far the powerful are willing to use their power, and how far others are willing to hand their own power to the feeble-minded.

One striking example of this is the power to deny historical facts about who first settled America and at what date.  The evidence for European and Catholic settlement of America as early as the mid 1300’s is actually overwhelming. However, the discovery of the Kensington Runestone in Minnesota in 1898 by Olaf Olman, led to the fact of his family being destroyed and his daughter driven to suicide. What the Kensington Runestone proved, without reasonable doubt, was exactly what it said:

“Eight Goths and 22 Northmen are on this acquisition expedition from Vinland far to the West. We had traps by two shelters one day’s travel north from this stone. We were fishing one day. After we came home I found ten men red with blood and dead. Avé Maria deliver from evils! I have ten men by the inland sea to look after our ship, fourteen days’ journey from this island Year 1362…

The furor created during the ensuing century among the academic community almost defies description. ‘Scholars’ tripped over each other falsifying documentation. Numerous ‘experts’ showed up suddenly declaring the Kensington Runestone inscription fraudulent, doing what they could to destroy the evidence.” [3]

Why is it so important to cover up the facts about the earliest settlers of modern America? Simply because its earliest discoverers were supported by the edifice of the Catholic Church, and this flies in the face of the fraud of Jewish superiority and the Mayflower Myth that was established once they took control of standardized IQ testing.  If the truth were known, then facts about the Jewish control of the slave trade in America, their alliance with the extremely violent Iriquois Nation, and their allied war against the earliest allied Catholic European and Indian settlers, would also have to be known and this would lead to possibly violent consequences for any scholar willing to discuss it or teach it.

The bottom line is that, in any talk of restitution of native lands, a court case would bring to light the fraudulent activity of the powers behind “Our Founding Fathers”.  They counted us as slaves from the beginning, no matter how fine were the words…and the true heroes are unsung and we are not free.

Not only in history, but in science as well, raw brute force alone dictates what is true and what is false.

When serious thinkers and scholars began to ask Freud evidence for his theories, the only response he could come up with is: “They can all go to hell.” Freud himself declared in a letter to his friend Wilhelm Fliess,

“I no longer understand the state of mind in which I hatched the psychology; I cannot conceive how I could have inflicted it on you…it appears to have been a kind of madness.”[1]

This doesn’t stop his theories from being offered in universities. Yes, a generation of our young is enslaving themselves to a lifetime of debt in order to learn scientific, economic, historic and medical frauds.  Sigmund Freud was appropriately named: Sick Man Fraud.

Jonas Alexis writes of this phenomenon, “One of the interesting things about Jewish subversive movements is that they never rest on a particular name or theme, though the fundamental ideology may remain constant. For example, when Bolshevism failed miserably and pathetically in the Soviet Union, its intellectual grandchildren and revolutionaries moved the movement to America under a different name: Neoconservatism (what I call Neo-Bolshevism).[1] 

The fact that under Bolshevism 60 million Christian white people were systematically murdered by Jewish Communists simply becomes a politically incorrect statement, to be replaced by the non-fact, though politically correct myth, of the Jewish Holocaust. Thus is dumbination achieved.

When socialism collapsed in eastern and central Europe around 1989, feminism was introduced to accomplish what socialism failed to do. Feminism is perhaps the most destructive subversive ideology, based as it is on discontent with one’s God-given role in life, even though that God-given role is one of power and grace.  It is no coincidence that the battle cry of the Protestants was vehemently against both the Virgin Mary and against symbolism of any kind.  Symbolism is a language that is difficult to control and it rests within the very alphabet that we use.  The female is a powerful symbol.

In creating the idea that womanhood and childbirth is shameful and inferior, people now welcome homosexuality, transgenderism, abortion and other forms of discontent that lead to physical mutilation, psychological trauma, institutionalized molestation of innocent children through government agendas, and inevitably to the extinction of the human race.

Other forms of discontent that are propagated through the use of outright lies involve dissatisfaction with one’s race, one’s financial situation, one’s nation, one’s history and of course, one’s religion.  The power to create such psychological and spiritual violence within society is remarkable in that it is welcomed.  How quickly it leads to the auto-genocide of entire races!

The Asians seem to be particularly susceptible to the ills of bolshevik materialism.  Their suicide rate, among both the very young all ages is described as ‘epidemic’.  The old are hiding themselves in shame over their poverty, committing suicide by jumping off bridges and drinking poison, and the young would rather die than deal with the pressures of making good grades on IQ tests.  Little do they realize that IQ tests are designed to elevate the feeble-minded.  What a nasty trick to play on people.

What the feeble-minded hope for is that “Ultimately, the labeled person’s identity comes to correspond with the general images” people are given about members of that particular social category…  “Identity is produced in the interaction between powerful labelers (usually official agents) and passive labellees who all too easily fall into prescribed roles as if they were ‘over-sensitive interpersonal cripples’ to use Coulter’s (1973) apt phrase…the sociologist abandons reality and embraces expectation. This expectation is then enforced. Those refusing to follow the enforced identity become ostracized, a type of solitary confinement without visible walls.” [2]

While the initial results of this ‘identity prescription’ is highly advantageous to the prescribers, if it truly is a lie, the result of the entire group’s ‘solitary confinement without visible walls’ is suicide.  The first reaction of the ostracized is self-blame for not ‘being normal’; and this is the goal of ostracism. But if the accusation is not justified, then things go awry. Depressive illness is considered to be caused by a temporal delay between the moral cause that initiated the sadness, and the time when the normal emotional response is allowed to come forth. [2]

Suicide is self-blame and self-punishment in one.  But no justice is achieved, only one more injustice, and so the overall societal depressive illness continues.  Only justice can end it.

Put simply, the end result of falsifying IQ test scores and questions, and the intended goal of subversive movements in general, is to wage frontal war against truth and happiness.  It’s a stressful way to live.

.

[1] Original Jonas Alexis article in full at http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/10/20/273850/

[2] “Stress and Stigma” 1985, Edited by Uta E. Gerhardt and Michael EJ Wadsworth, Macmillan Press.

[3] “In 1898 while clearing a field in Kensington Minnesota Olaf Olman unearthed what quickly became known as the Kensington runestone. The table slab sized rock was covered with Nordic ruins whose translation dated it at 1362. Dozens of witness’s claim the stone was wrapped in the roots of a Poplar tree that had been there for years and multiple geologists examined the engravings and said the inscriptions were weathered in the same manner as the stone.

In 1898 while clearing a field in Kensington Minnesota Olaf Olman unearthed what quickly became known. The inscriptions were later translated to read: “Eight Goths and 22 Northmen are on this acquisition expedition from Vinland far to the West. We had traps by two shelters one day’s travel north from this stone. We were fishing one day. After we came home I found ten men red with blood and dead. Avé Maria deliver from evils! I have ten men by the inland sea to look after our ship, fourteen days’ journey from this island Year 1362.”

The Kensington Runestone

The furor the Kensington Runestone created during the ensuing century among the academic community almost defies description. Olman’s family was destroyed and his daughter driven to suicide. “Scholars” tripped over each other falsifying documentation. With little to no referencing thirty-two “experts” in Scandinavian linguistics declared the Kensington Runestone inscription fraudulent. They were led by Erik Moltke, the official Runologist of the Danish National Museum, who called them an “abortion.”

Minnesota Archeologist R.H. Landon had the stone coated with engine oil and scrubbed with a powerful solvent attempting to “clean” it. In an effort to caste disparagement on the Kensington Runestone itself Dr. Kari Ellen Gade now a professor of Germanic Studies at Indiana University and 4 other Graduate students perpetrated their own hoax near the Kensington Runestone Park. Theodore C. Blegen of the Minnesota Historical Society invented a deathbed confession ostensibly proving that Olaf Olman a man barely staving off poverty with 36 weeks of education and nine children forged the stone himself.

All of this occurred in spite of the fact that N.H. Winchell the state geologist of Minnesota, along with the state geologist for Wisconsin, verified the inscriptions antiquity as early as 1909-1910. They were ignored and marginalized in favor of primitive academic pseudo sciences.

The Geological evidence is overwhelming but it always seems to be legal experts that must conclusively explain to academia that physical evidence and not their theories are what’s important in figuring out how past events transpired.

Richard Nielsen and Scott Wolter are both acknowledged expert witnesses in court cases involving construction failure. Nielsen felt the controversy would be settled once and for all by examining the petrographic data. He hired Wolter a renowned independent court expert in forensic geology to examine the runestone using the high-tech microscopy that is used to examine the forensics of failed concrete in legal decisions. The results were conclusive and confirmed the antiquity of the runestone’s inscriptions.

Wolter found that 3 of the R runes on the stone have dots. Similar R’s with dots are found in Sweden on medieval gravestones although dotted R’s in medieval runic inscriptions were not known to exist until 1935. Wolter then went to the source, the Cistercian monasteries on the Island of Gotland in the Baltic Sea off the coast of Sweden. There he found gravestones with the dotted R’s that were dated 1449.

The date on the runestone is verifiable through the Easter Table. This was a secret authentication technique practiced by Cistercian scribes where some runes were accentuated so they can be checked on a chart of corresponding calendar dates called the Easter table. The date that is given in the runes is verified when it is the same as the one given through the Easter table code. The Kensington Runestone has crosses through the staves on 3 of the runes that should not be there .When checked against the table the 3 runes give a date of 1362.

Scholars strenuously objected to the two dots punched above some of the runes known as umlauts. Umlauts denote a runes pronunciation, such as the dots above the hooked X on the Kensington Runestone that denote its pronunciation as an A. It was believed umlauts were not used in medieval runic inscriptions but Richard Nielsen pointed out no less than eight uses of umlauts in the Codex Runicus, a Nordic manuscript from the year 1300.

The umlauts and the hooked X’s both surfaced in the Larson Papers published in 2004 along with seven of the other rare runes used on the stone. The Larson papers are Masonic ciphers allegedly written down in 1883 and 1885. The hooked X is also found on Roslyn Chapel which was completed in 1486.

Edited from the ‘Larson Paper’:

Roslyn Chapel has stone carvings of corn and agave cactus, found only in the New World. The carvings on the 215 blocks found along the pillars and arches inside bare an uncanny resemblance to the block writing of the Maya. Many of its carved figures are similar to Mesoamerican art.

Another runestone was found in Upernavik on the coast of Greenland in 1824. The Kingittorsuaq runestone details a Norse journey to Greenland and was double dated to 1314 using the Easter Table method. Mysterious holes are drilled into large rocks interspersed around both the sites of the Kingittorsuaq and the Kensington Runestone. The holes appear to be post holes for ship moorings and the Kensington Runestone makes reference to an island and an inland sea.

Tom Trow the past archeologist for the Minnesota historical Society claims there is no evidence that water levels were that high. Unless of course someone should happen to notice the 11,842 lakes that dot the “land of 10,000 lakes” which is what people call Minnesota. In Corona, South Dakota the same type of holes are also found near carvings of a Norse drinking Horn and a Dagger. Pitted out feldspar along the carved surface area prove the antiquity of the carvings.

It is known that that the Norse reached Nova Scotia in 1398 but apparently so did the Scots, perhaps unified under Christianity. The area inland of Nova Scotia was populated by a tribe called the Mi’kmaq [McCormick] who have a “legend” about a man called Glooscap [Glascow] who came from the East on the backs of Whales, a century before Columbus. The Zeno Narrative states that the Prince of Orkney [Islands of the Arc] , led an expedition from the Orkney Islands westward to an unknown land in 1398 AD.

Frederick J. Pohl in his book ‘Atlantic Crossings Before Columbus’ gives 17 examples where the Mi’kmaq legend is identical with the Zeno expedition.

The Zeno Narrative states that they took with them the latest of cannonry and a c. 1380 cannon was found at Louisburg Harbor [Fort St. Louis], Cape Breton, Nova Scotia, in 1849. The cannon dated back to the late 1300′s. It is even known that the Mi’kmaq’s were playing a primitive game of hockey, a European game, called Shinny prior to European contact and held the cross in reverence. Beatrice M. Hay in the December 30, 1927 edition of Canadian National Railways Magazine remarked that missionaries believe the Mi’kmaq may have learned of Christianity from earlier Viking visits. The Mi’kmaq [McCormick?] flag is identical to a Templar battle flag and both resemble depictions of the Crab nebula’s birth in Chaco Canyon.

There is a preponderance of archeological evidence that well before the voyage of Columbus Europeans landed and at least built temporary settlements on the Northeastern shoreline of America. Carved into a glacial boulder on the highest hilltop in Westford, Massachusetts, is the hilt of a sword which some claim is all that is left visible of what was once the image of a Knight and the family crest of the Gunn’s. The shrine was placed there to commemorate the death of Sir James Gunn chronicled in the Zeno narrative.

Westford Knight” has not been dated but its placement is on a pre European path “used by the Indians.”

Most controversial of all perhaps because they verify the slaughter chronicled in the Kensington runestone are the Spirit Pond Runestone’s. Discovered in Phippsburg, Maine in 1971 the actual dates of the carving and the interpretations are still disputed by scholars but its eastward orientation is according to a little known medieval practice of orientating maps towards Jerusalem. Its hooked X, its dating according to the Easter table method and its resemblance to the Kingittorsuaq make the Spirit Pond Runestone difficult to dismiss as a hoax. It’s map points south and its inscription reads Vinland two days journey.

Following the stones directions we come to Pojac Point in Narragansett Bay and find more runic inscriptions baring the hooked X carved on a two ton boulder that is underwater most of time but visible at extreme low tide for 20 minutes a day.

The Narragansett Runestone was discovered in 1984 by clam diggers. Six hundred years ago it would have acted as a signpost for sailing vessels because the shoreline was 200 feet further out placing it right above the high tide line. In this case the smoking gun lies just across the bay in Newport Rhode Island.

In the heart of Newport on Mill Street sits the Newport Tower.  The Tower was noted by Verrazano as a Norman Villa on maps recording his exploration of the New England Coast in 1527. It is also depicted on Gerardus Mercator’s great world map of 1569. “Scholars” have made the claim for years that it was built by Benedict Arnold the first and modeled after a windmill in Chesterton England, “his hometown.”

Throughout the years there have been numerous attempts to ascertain the towers actual age. Adjusted dates for the Carbon dating of the mortar and excavations around it indicates work was done on it in the sixteenth century but readings nearer its foundation indicate a thirteenth century date for its actual construction.

The fact is the English registry’s show the Arnold family lived a hundred miles from the Chesterton windmill and it was built almost at the time of the Arnold family’s departure for America. It’s extremely doubtful than an Arnold ever laid eyes on the Chesterton England Windmill.

Besides for their proportions and cylindrical symmetry the two structures bear little resemblance to each other. The Newport Towers windows are seemingly irregularly spaced squares while the windmills windows are regularly spaced uniform rectangles. The Windmill has six arches supported by six pillars while the Tower has eight arch’s supported by eight pillars in accordance with the traditional Templar method of constructing churches. Circular patterns of red discolorations in the clay around the Tower would indicate that it would have had an ambulatory, just like Templar churches but unlike the windmill.

On the winter solstice at 9AM the sun shines through the south window and illuminates an egg shaped keystone within the tower. The Round Church: Its original construction dates back to 1130.”