Expert Analysis: Arab and Jewish Military

The following is a report published in Middle East Forum, which is generally a ‘blame America for everything’ site, but the this article from 1999 doesn’t fit the usual pattern.  This expert not only describes the Arab army mentality, but also illustrates that the culture of the Arabs, while opposite in every way to American mentality, is at the same time exactly one and the same with Jewish culture, here called ‘Soviet’.  My previous articles have been about this exact subject.  Jews are Arabs, historically, genetically and culturally speaking.

The basic flaw in Jewish and Arab armies is their use of deceitful friendships and other lies and subterfuge as a strategy for winning a war, preferably without actually going into battle.  The result is total mistrust of everyone by everyone on every level, which cripples all their efforts. Another flaw is their contempt for soldiers.  In accordance with Jewish supremacist ideology, their leadership refuses to get their hands dirty or do any work, because it would ‘diminish’ them in the eyes of their underlings.

We will break out of this mess when Americans ally with their ancient allies instead of their ancient enemies.  The Arabs have been ancient enemies of White Israelite people, but because we have ceased to identify ourselves as the Salic tribes of Israel, we find ourselves in the awkward position of having them as allies of our paper government. Not surprisingly, such things as ‘rules of engagement’ are crippling our military from within. Our traditional allies are Russia, Christian Syria and all of Europe. By traditional I mean ancient.  If they look like us physically and culturally, they are us. But do have a sharp eye, because slanty eyed imposters abound, along with the usual culprits.

Please share this article with interested parties.  It is long, but here is the author’s Conclusion:

“It would be difficult to exaggerate the cultural gulf separating American and Arab military cultures. In every significant area, American military advisors find students who enthusiastically take in their lessons and then resolutely fail to apply them. The culture they return to—the culture of their own armies in their own countries—defeats the intentions with which they took leave of their American instructors.

When they had an influence on certain Arab military establishments, the Soviets reinforced [had the same traits as] their clients’ cultural traits far more than, in more recent years, Americans were able to. Like the Arabs’, the Soviets’ military culture was driven by political fears bordering on paranoia. The steps taken to control the sources (real or imagined) of these fears, such as a rigidly centralized command structure, were readily understood by Arab political and military elites. The Arabs, too, felt an affinity for the Soviet officer class’s contempt for ordinary soldiers and the Soviet military hierarchy’s distrust of a well-developed, well-appreciated, well-rewarded NCO corps.

Arab political culture is based on a high degree of social stratification, very much like that of the defunct Soviet Union and very much unlike the upwardly mobile, meritocratic, democratic United States.

Arab officers do not see any value in sharing information among themselves, let alone with their men. In this they follow the example of their political leaders, who not only withhold information from their own allies, but routinely deceive them. Training in Arab armies reflects this: rather than prepare as much as possible for the multitude of improvised responsibilities that are thrown up in the chaos of battle, Arab soldiers, and their officers, are bound in the narrow functions assigned them by their hierarchy. That this renders them less effective on the battlefield, let alone places their lives at greater risk, is scarcely of concern, whereas, of course, these two issues are dominant in the American military culture, and are reflected in American military training.

Author’s note: My experience has revealed that they are very, very dependent on their cell phones for communication. This report reveals to me that perhaps they would simply not know what to do without this communication.  They all have the most expensive I Phones and use facebook messaging.  They also use white fake-friendly decoys for gathering intelligence.  These are psychologically dangerous people who have turned from friend to enemy in a heartbeat, and I speak from personal experience.  They are now in my neighborhood, but this convinced me to move away, at least until more people become aware of the danger and start protecting other whites.  Do not expose yourself to them.  Those who help them will be made their first victims. Beware of strangers and don’t assume that all white people will be sympathetic with other whites.  My experience showed that the white decoy relays the message of a ‘racist’ to his black network and his Arab network at the same time.  Their bravado is completely dependent on their ability to message and send for a gang. They depend on the overwhelming numerical superiority that their facebook messaging affords them.  Their definition of ‘racist’ is any white person who has self-respect.

DECEMBER 1999 • VOLUME 6: NUMBER 4

Hungarian

The White Army in Pre-Christianity

The ancient culture of early white European armies is recorded as ‘Greek’ history.  An absolutley essential and required book in every library is the Anabasis.  It tells the story of the lessons learned by a mercenary army from Greece whose entire officer corps had been tricked into an ambush that was supposed to be a friendly parley according to Greek practice.  This left the entire army in foreign territory, surrounded by enemies.  Their employer was dead and they couldn’t return in the same direction. Deep inside ancient Persia, they had to head north first and then turn West to get back to their Greece.  On the way, Zenophon describes many pre-Christian people and their cultures at that time.  This is the best description of pre-Christian people and their culture that I’ve found.

Arab use of subterfuge and false friendship is something that I’ve witnessed a few times in my personal life, and I write this article as a warning.  Zenophon advised the Greek army to become an army of 10,000 generals, which is to say, to think for yourself.  This is one of the most fascinating stories I’ve ever read, and it’s about 2400 years old.

Ancient History Sourcebook:
Xenophon: Anabasis, or March Up Country of the Greek Armies


Xenophon the Athenian was born 431 B.C. He was a pupil of Socrates. He marched with the Spartans, and was exiled from Athens. Sparta gave him land and property in Scillus, where he lived for many years before having to move once more, to settle in Corinth. He died in 354 B.C.

The Anabasis is his story of the march to Persia to aid Cyrus, who enlisted Greek help to try and take the throne from Artaxerxes, and the ensuing return of the Greeks, in which Xenophon played a leading role. This occurred between 401 B.C. and March 399 B.C.

Contents

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s