The flag called the Union Jack represents the union of the twelve tribes of Jacob under the Christian cross. The Confederate Flag of the American South is based on this flag, as a reminder that we are the true Israelites. No wonder it’s hated by the 13th Tribe.
The Salic Arms of Scotland is more precisely the Salic Arms of King Robert the Bruce of Scotland. The name Broussard derives from Bruce, and the word ‘Salic’ refers to King Saul, but why are we not more aware of these things? The Bruces of Scotland settled in France, became de la Brosse, and from there went to Nova Scotia, and from there went to Louisiana.
Who is it that is slandering the Salic flag, if not the very people who are most threatened by a union of the Salic tribes, by the discovery of the true tribes of Israel? Who is it that is still very much aware of King Saul if not the very group who has hidden this history from us and taken his place unjustly?
Why is the Bible forbidden in public schools, even as we create wars based on Bible scripture mis-translations concerning a group of people who call themselves Jews? Why has reverence for Jesus been replaced by worship of the Jewish people here in America, for anyone can insult Jesus and Southerners and Acadians, but any criticism of Jews results in complete social ostracism.
I hear talk of people wishing to return to the pre-Christian pagan days, as though they were rosy times compared to these. We have the luxury of not being aware of the religions that included child sacrifice as part of their ritual, but these did and do exist. Not all pre-christians practiced child sacrifice of course.
King Saul and the Salic tribes were pre-Christians who descend from Jacob. The Salic tribes of the Israelites split off from the tribe of David and Judah in Judea after the death of Saul and his sons. The Edomites under David forbade the burial of the bodies of Saul and his sons, so their sister stayed to keep the vultures from their bodies. She turns up later as the wife of the Pharo. Jerusalem was now a very hostile environment for them. My conclusion is that the Salic Tribes formed the New Kingdom on the Nile. The oldest maps of the world show the Jordan and the Nile as the same river, bending toward the South. This would encompass the Saba region on both sides of the Red Sea, precisely where the white tribes were called the Beja, a name with the same root sound as Benjamin.
Muslim and Christian scholars point out that the story of the Benjamites as homosexual was not originally in the Bible. That and the story of Lot having sex with his daughters are both pointed out by scholars as stories taken word for word from the Jewish Talmud and inserted in places to change the Bible, especially to discredit the tribe of Benjamin. Sheik Imran Nazar Hussein is a Muslim scholar who speaks vehemently about the wrongness of these scriptural crimes. The scholars point out that the story of Saul losing his kingship makes no sense on many levels, and is pointed out as one of the most doubtful sections of the bible, historically. It’s riddled with irregularities and all of them have the result of promoting and attempting to justify the usurpation of the throne of Israel by David, at least as it is presented on paper. It’s possible that none of it ever happened, and that Saul remained King or a son of his returned, his son being named, logically enough, Soloman.
The reason for making the Benjamites look bad is because the tribe of David usurped their position and occupied their inheritance, inserting pro-Judah propaganda and mis-translation to do so. This is detailed in the footnotes of the Oxford Study Bible. Saul was a Benjamite, so it’s ridiculous to believe that his entire tribe of the Benjamites stayed with David after David’s people murdered Saul’s family. It’s plain to see that the tribe of David had to claim alliance, not a real alliance but just the appearance of one, with the tribe of Benjamin whose inheritance was Jerusalem and all the best real estate of what we call Palestine.
After David convinced Saul’s son and daughter to betray him, the rest of Saul’s people left Jerusalem, and there is archaeological evidence that a large portion of the city was abandoned at this time while the buildings were still standing. These were the people who migrated away and eventually became us, the lost tribes.
The Acadians especially are identified as the tribe of Benjamin, according to a local Rabbi that I consulted. But since the Benjamites are saddled with the slander of having been homosexual, no one today wants to claim that heritage. This is why Jesus chastised the scribes more than any other group.
Salic history is in the bible, but they are not identified clearly as Salic unless you examine the genealogies and the correct spelling of the names. The scribes love to switch the vowels around in the translations from a language with no vowels. Be alert to this. There were no vowels! Therefore the word for Saul is basically the same as Sela and Shiloh and I am certain that the Psalms were written by Saul or someone of the Sallic tribes. The only mention of David is inserted into titles. There is no mention of him in the body of the text of the Psalms. Isn’t it apparent that Psalms and Saul have the same root?
The Salic tribes, at different times are called Persians,
Samaritans, Ethiopians and
Benjamin can be literally translated as Son of Yemen. Historians have identified them as the very Persians who exiled the tribe of Judah during the time of Jehediah. Bible scholars note that the glosses of the bible all have in common the promotion and slanting of truth concerning the Tribe of Judah.
The true translation of the scripture reveals that Benjamin is the ‘Fierce Lion’, and Judah is the either the wolf or the Lion’s suckling offspring. The Lion’s Gate is the Benjamin Gate.
A careful study of the bible sections dealing with this era is necessary to understand this, but the scripture needs to be re-translated to English in order to clear up misconceptions. Also, these questionable additions to the bible, which scholars also agree were later insertions, should be removed immediately.
A saltire is a heraldic symbol in the form of an “x”. St Andrew was martyred on a x-shaped cross, so the saltire is heavily associated with him, and since he is the patron saint of Scotland, it should be no surprise that their flag is simple white saltire on a blue background.
Saltires are found on other national flags, including Jamaica and Grenada, and US state flags such as Alabama and Florida. and is believed to have been an inspiration for the Confederate battle flag, popularly (though incorrectly) known as “the stars and bars”
Salic means the descendants of Saul and his followers, no matter what anyone tries to tell you, this is the origin of the word. The reason it deals with inheritance laws, as in ‘The Salic Law’ is because the men of the tribe of Benjamin had been slaughtered at one time, and then several other times, and the issue of inheritance for the remaining females had to be dealt with.
After the slaughter, clan property would have gone to the non-Benjamite husbands of the remaining Benjamite women, and then there would have been no inheritance for the Benjamites.
In order to prevent the clan property from going to the hostile in-laws of a Benjamite woman, the inheritance would at times skip over the woman and go to a near relative who would help her to protect her property. It was never meant to indicate that women are incapable of handling property or ruling. Anyone, male or female, needs clan support to protect clan property. This is the precise reason that the Mossad targets the males of the family for assassination, the women are targeted for character assassination, which then leaves the women with no protection.
King Saul was God’s appointed and anointed King. David was not anointed. Neither was Queen Elizabeth I or any other Protestant royal after her. Usurpers hate the idea of being anointed because it smacks of Divine Appointment.
If only people would read the Bible carefully, they would realize that King David set the pattern for enslavement, extortion and privilege that our present rulers follow. He was a traitor and a bandit who was rejected by his people in the end, and only saved by the kindness of one of his sons. Why was there not another King David after him? Why was the next King named after Saul, for this is what Saloman is. This is all written as clearly as can be by David’s tribal propagandists. But our eyes see what they want to see and disregard the rest. The subject of people with eyes being blind is repeated often by Jesus.
Didn’t Jesus himself say clearly that he is not the ‘son of David’? “How could I be”, he said, “when David calls the Messiah Lord?” in Isaiah. What father would call his son ‘Lord’. Jesus had found a place in scripture that had escaped the censors. This is why the Pharisees walked out when he asked the question, and why they began in earnest to kill him after this. And right after they walked away he predicted their downfall. Herod feared the baby Jesus for the fact that Jesus was of the family of the legitimate high priesthood. Zacharia, the uncle of Jesus, was killed so that Simon, the Levite who was not of the Zadok family, could take over the high priesthood by marrying his daughter to Herod. Josephus tells most of this.
Salic law provided written codification of both civil law, such as the statutes governing inheritance, and criminal law, such as the punishment for murder. It has had a formative influence on the tradition of statute law that has extended to modern times in Central Europe, especially in the German states, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, parts of Italy, Austria and Hungary, Romania, and the Balkans. (wikipedia)
The above excerpt gives a good idea of where the lost 12 tribes of the Israelites went and how they maintained their tribal system of justice which we are seeing destroyed daily by the corruption of the 13th tribe called ‘David’, who falsely identify themselves as ‘Israel’.
In the Quran, an entire chapter is devoted to the Virgin Mary. Other chapters speak of Jesus as Messiah. There are some weird parts that bother me, it’s true. There was a point in history when the only true copy of the Koran was stolen from Abed Al Rahman I, who died shortly afterwards, so it is possible that Koranic scripture was corrupted, but the Muslims consider it blasphemy to even mention this possibility. Also, Arabic writing does not have a clear word order, at the same time as it has the custom of asking “Is he not”, or “is it not”. This allows a translator to change, “Is he not a prophet?” to “He is not a prophet” very easily, along with many other possible mis-translations.
The Encyclopedia of Islam details how the 13th Tribe set about creating Islam as a sect of Christianity. Begin with the entry for Damascus and go from there. Besides the fact that the Quran points to the Jews as culprits for changing scripture, Mary is called a sister of Aaron, which makes her a Levite and therefore so was Jesus. He had to have been a Levite, like his uncle Zacharia, but not just any Levite. He was of the family of Zadok, as in Melchizedek, which means the lineage of the Sumo Sacerdote, the High Priesthood. Therefore not of the Tribe of either David or Judah.
The depopulation agenda seems to be their fear that we have become legion. I have no problem with the idea that Jesus had children. It seems the most logical thing to do, especially if he came to live as a human and to change the world. He called his disciples his children many times. There is so much that we don’t know.
So if Jesus married Mary Magdelene, and if Magdelene is the Scottish Marcher Lord or Marquise de Allan, for which there is mounting evidence, then we are talking of the Tribes of the Allans which would logically be a Sallic tribe. The reason for this is because the Allans lived in Pergamum which is a corruption of the word Benjamin. The very word Babylon means “Gate of the Allan”, and a city of this name is shown on ancient maps of Pergamum, which is Turkey today, only the Allans left a long time ago.
Imagine the union of the true high priest with a descendant of God’s anointed King Saul, just at a time when the Edomite usurpers are controlling Jerusalem. Surely Herod had reason to be threatened. Surely Jesus knew of the danger. The Quran simply says that ‘it appeared that he died’. That could mean many things, including that he was an angelic being who could not be killed. Is it worth killing millions of human beings and destroying the world over this question? Perhaps it is. Only God knows.